Not stopping the developer from publishing updates as new apps, then the user would have to purchase again. They could even leave the old version in there so that users could still download it if they change devices.
On Sep 30, 10:46 am, "Mark Murphy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yikes! So if there is a particular paid app that the user purchased, > > but is no longer published on the Market, that user will not have > > access to it anymore? > > That may be part of the tradeoff of the "lifestream" model that the > Android Market uses. On the plus side (for users), they get all updates > for free for as long as the developer publishes the app. On the minus > side, if the developer pulls publication of the app, you may lose access. > > In a sense, it's a subscription delivery model without a subscription > pricing model. Personally, I think things would have made more sense if > they lined the two up (e.g., what you purchase on the Market is a one-year > subscription to the app and its updates). > > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com > Android App Developer Books:http://commonsware.com/books.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
