I've looked at the rest of the proposed changes. They look pretty good to me, but I'll give it one more look once the new draft is published.
Again, just for completeness... you would have to define 'sheltered' where I think 'protected' or 'isolated' might be more easily understood. Deb On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 12:24 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Deb Cooley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for that work. Just one quick suggestion now, I'll review > the rest > > after the telechat today. > > > sheltered could be 'protected' or 'isolated'? > > I'll go with "protected", but I wonder if we shouldn't find a place to > define > "sheltered" to mean that some generic protections are in place, but not > specific negative ACLs. > > Thank you. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
