Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for IIOP

[Stefan Bodewig]

Rob van Oostrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm not 100% sure on this, but I thought the convention is to always
> call your implementation InterfaceNameImpl. If this is true, you
> could just do a straight-forward text treatment and drop de Impl
> from the implementation class.

Possible, but I wouldn't want to rely on this.  I fear using
reflection here would be extremely slow.

Stefan