hang on I'll do a quick-and-dirty benchmark. I've done scarier things with reflection than this, and I wouldn't categorize them as "extremely" slow. I suspect just looking up an implemented interface shouldn't cause too much problems Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Rob van Oostrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm not 100% sure on this, but I thought the convention is to always > > call your implementation InterfaceNameImpl. If this is true, you > > could just do a straight-forward text treatment and drop de Impl > > from the implementation class. > > Possible, but I wouldn't want to rely on this. I fear using > reflection here would be extremely slow. > > Stefan
- PATCH to Rmic.java Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java Stefan Bodewig
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java Stefan Bodewig
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java Stefan Bodewig
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for IIOP Stefan Bodewig
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for IIOP Rob van Oostrum
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for IIOP Stefan Bodewig
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for IIOP Rob van Oostrum
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for IIO... Rob van Oostrum
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for... Stefan Bodewig
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java... Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for IIO... Stefan Bodewig
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for... Rob van Oostrum
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java... Stefan Bodewig
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for IIOP Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
- Re: PATCH to Rmic.java for IIOP Stefan Bodewig