smtp is just one of many protocols out there, a primitive, fairly unimportant and severely lacking in terms of security one at that, and it's protection cannot be a reason for any disconnection -ever-.

On 30 ينا, 2017 م 01:17, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker wrote:

and now it's time for everyone here, to stop giving stevieboy his way with his absurd definitions of 'abuse'... if there is no law against it in the country in which the customer recides. its no reason for disconnection. doing so is not delivering a paid service, caving into blackmail, and undermining provider immunity by caving in to any random idiot that just so happens to have gained influence over mail delivery, and frequently abuses said (advertised) influence to commit computer sabotage (he knows what the impacts of his listings are, he advertises with it), to extort the internet industry into wasting valuable manhours on him and his self-declared 'delisting procedure', and breach valuable contracts.

if he mentions any ip address (or worse: personal details) in his crappy slander and blackmail system he calls 'spamhaus' just call the feds on him. the guardia civil for example as he currently is in spain.

viola 13

puerta d' andratx.

under no circumstance should 'spamhaus' be allowed to dictate which customers to serve and which not. simple as that.


now act PROFESSIONAL and stop giving this idiot his way just because he mentions 'spam'. as if 'spam'

is the worst thing that ever happened to the internet... how about him trying to get entire isps disconnected. who gives a shit about him and his 'spam'.




On 30 ينا, 2017 م 01:09, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker wrote:

one would almost go and set up a few 1000 smtp servers, all sending steve linford viagra offers, just to annoy the guy back. operational costs would go through the roof tho lol.


On 30 ينا, 2017 م 01:04, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker wrote:

btw. this is europe. not america. we can say fuck however many times we want over here. tyvm. and in the case of spamhaus, it's fully applicable. spamhaus IS a cancer. that was using this mailinglist just a few hours ago to try to further the reach of their cancerous censorship tool disguised as a 'spam fighter'


On 30 ينا, 2017 م 01:03, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker wrote:

if the fully appropriate language used is the only thing you can think of as an argument, that shows it's completely right. lol. you're free to google 'cb3rob' and see what steve linford told the 'world press' about our operations in the past. so far for inappropriate language.



On 30 ينا, 2017 م 12:58, Tobias Knecht wrote:
Hello,

@Sven Olaf:
Please stop using this type of offensive language!
This is a public mailinglist and not a place for you to rant and attack in the way you are at the moment.

So step back for a minute, take a deep breath and calm down!

And if you feel you can send a message without using this type of language, feel free to do so, otherwise stay away!

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to me directly.

Thanks,

Tobias

--
​RIPE Anti Abuse Working Group Co-Chair


​

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:46 PM, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker <sv...@xs4all.nl <mailto:sv...@xs4all.nl>> wrote:

    btw it would be of great assistance in this matter if transit
    carriers, simply, only HAD asn's and no ip prefixes that can
    be used as a blackmailing vector. don't quite see why everyone
    combines the 'isp' part with the 'transit providing' part of
    their operations. parties that provide transit, have no need
    for ip space (bgp sessions are better on 10.0.0.0/8
    <http://10.0.0.0/8> anyway, prevents attack from 'outside').
    if there are no ip's there is nothing idiots like spamhaus (so
    far they are the only ones) can 'blacklist' to 'build up
    pressure' to breach contracts. so just split up those operations.


    On 30 ينا, 2017 م 12:32, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker
    wrote:

    customer wants to send packets from ip A to ip b... did they
    arrive? -> yes. we did our job. no -> we did not do our job.
    i can't quite see why we would even need to know what 'smtp'
    is. nor any of the other obscure shit protocols out there.


    On 30 ينا, 2017 م 12:30, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker
    wrote:

    content. is NEVER. network-related-abuse.

    'making more use of a mail protocol that in every other way
    is used as intended' is also not 'network-related-abuse' in
    fact it's not abuse at all. it's like tv advertisements.

    'malware and virusses' all simply exploit the same old
    services 'provided' by crappy windows malware, which should
    get some import restrictions, and the problem is solved ay.
    it's windows itself that is the malware there...

    'phishing'... so you're saying your bank login procedure
    sucks balls and/or you think 16 numbers on the front and 3
    top secret ones on the back of a plastic card people show in
    every restaurant they go to are 'security' - go fix your own
    crap and stop bothering us, we forward -packets-. we don't
    have time to hunt ghosts for your broken financial services.

    'announcing the whole god damn internet split up into
    /24s'.. - yes .. that's 'abuse'. lol.

    and either way... if someone doesn't like what someone else
    is doing they can take them to the -appropriate- courts (of
    the other party) and try to get them to stop... blackmailing
    the sales department of the transit carriers of their
    supplier of their supplier of their supplier, will only make
    them change isps, cause financial loss (or gains: setup
    fees), etc.

    so far all spamhaus has ever established is:

    - a whole lot of unroutable/unsellable/unusable ipv4
    'burned' ranges.

    - smtp is no longer peer to peer (their bashing on open relays)

    - smtp is no longer real time (graylisting)

    - smtp is no longer reliable (with over 20 million ip
    addresses listed despite there only being 300k mailservers
    in the world, no wonder!)

    so instead of stopping spam, they managed to kill of smtp.
    congratulations.

    everyone now uses skype and facebook (which are real-time
    and do have friends-lists) lolol. you have succeeded in
    bringing microsoft and facebook users to spy on. well done.

    if smtp is 'getting less' that is only because it has no
    users left. people only start it up to read ripe
    mailinglists (lol) or sign up for habbo hotel. FACT. lol.

    none of our customers has ever sent UCE from our networks...
    because... ever since 2004... we have simply blocked port
    25... smtp only causes -shit- and it -delivers shit-
    (abusemail and 'legal' threats about shit that is not our
    problem). we sure as hell have some customers that cause
    'shit' but they usually do it in somewhat more profitable
    markets than sending 'spam' and most definately can buy a tv
    station or 2 to do their advertisements on. tyvm spamhaus. lol.

    where this 'mytical' spammer that can pay our 1000-1500
    euros per month per server would come from, i don't know, i
    certainly have never met any... i tried to invoice one 60k
    once and he backed off already. poor spammers. they're like
    child porn people. can't pay for anything, so not an urgent
    issue at all.

    our customers frequently have the entire fucking cia rolling
    over their doorstep and if it's not them its the god damn
    copyright mafia. slightly different budgetarial picture
    there. shit that -is- worth the trouble.

    now, please take your shitty nagging about 'abuse' of your
    crappy silly old smtp protocol, which doesn't even
    -originate- from our networks in the first fucking place,
    and stick it where the sun doesn't shine... as for
    malware... windows is the malware there... it facilitates
    all the programs residing on top of the same old 1990s badly
    implemented os/2 ripoff crap. so basically call mickeysoft
    and ask them to fix the bugs they all exploit, or call the
    european commission and impose trade bans against microsoft.
    simple enough.


    On 30 ينا, 2017 م 12:13, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von
    CyberBunker wrote:

    advertising the sale of : viagra, sex slaves, ak47s, porn
    of any kind, human trafficing services, specific animals,
    cocain, data obtained through espionage, encryption
    technology, vpns, gay propaganda, military propaganda, etc
    is subject to applicable local law (if any, and if there is
    none, it's perfectly fine)... not 'spamhaus policies' as
    spamhaus is not supposed to be 'the internet government'.
    even if they think they should be.

    if the uk wants to keep certain products from entering
    'their' territory (and in doing so limit the freedom of
    their own stakeholders/tax payers) that is up to them
    others choose not to work against their own
    stakeholders/tax payers that way. they have a customs
    department to keep said products outside. can't tell others
    not to produce or sell or advertise it. setting up dirty
    front operations like 'spamhaus' to lure naive nerds into
    the illusion that they would be 'fighting spam' is a very
    nasty thing to do. geo-political wise and business wise.

    now... in thailand porn is illegal... so... let's
    disconnect all porn sites because thailand wants us to, oh
    but wait, thailand doesn't have a 'spamhaus' thinking they
    rule the entire internet through means of blackmail and
    calling people 'spammers' or 'spam supporters'.

    what also works, besides blackmailing with committing
    computer sabotage against the sales department of suppliers
    of suppliers of suppliers of the publisher of a website,
    are: assassins, commandos, carpet bombing, agent orange.
    etc... all of which should be deployed against spamhaus if
    you ask me. :P but a nullroute would suffice. lol. after
    all bgp is an 'advisory' to 'voluntary peers' and 'we don't
    block anything' as they themselves always say.


    On 30 ينا, 2017 ص 11:29, Esa Laitinen wrote:


    On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:19 PM HRH Prince Sven Olaf von
    CyberBunker <sv...@xs4all.nl <mailto:sv...@xs4all.nl>> wrote:

        also it's quite vague that when some mossadis rent
        servers and run an espionage botnet on it (which we
        happily intercept ourselves ofcourse) - spamhaus
        somehow magically never lists -that-.. just



    Looking at the amusing rant of Sven Olaf, it seems that
    the listing works!

    Keep up the good work, spamhaus et al!

    esa










Reply via email to