don't like the activities of some entities on the internet? 1: figure out who they are, if -need be- get a court order against their isp to fork up the details (make sure you harrass the right one) 2: take that entity doing it to court...

if it's not 'illegal' or 'criminal' where they just so happen to operate from... bad luck for you. they can do as they please. live with it.

you cannot go around forcing isps and carriers to 'interact' with you (and a few 100 other entities like you)... that's not how it works. should you want us to interact with you we can set up a fee... something along the lines of 1000 euros per 'abusemail' and we'll look at it. (-look at it-, not give you your way ;)


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: RBL policy
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:09:55 +0000
From:   HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker <sv...@xs4all.nl>
Organization:   Republic CyberBunker
To:     anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net



 Strafgesetzbuch (StGB)
 § 240 Nötigung

(1) Wer einen Menschen rechtswidrig mit Gewalt oder durch Drohung mit einem empfindlichen Übel zu einer Handlung, Duldung oder Unterlassung nötigt, wird mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren oder mit Geldstrafe bestraft. (2) Rechtswidrig ist die Tat, wenn die Anwendung der Gewalt oder die Androhung des Übels zu dem angestrebten Zweck als verwerflich anzusehen ist.
(3) Der Versuch ist strafbar.
(4) In besonders schweren Fällen ist die Strafe Freiheitsstrafe von sechs Monaten bis zu fünf Jahren. Ein besonders schwerer Fall liegt in der Regel vor, wenn der Täter

1.
   eine Schwangere zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch nötigt oder
2.
   seine Befugnisse oder seine Stellung als Amtsträger mißbraucht.


being forced to spend manhours (= money) to 'delist' from 3rd party dns blacklists is 'empflindliche uebel', and yes you are forcing them into a 'handlung (delisting/acting AGAINST their paying customer), duldung (ignoring the fact that you call them and others affected by your block 'spammers') or 'unterlassung' (interfering with their provider immunity and right to sell services to anyone, anywhere, and keep doing so - as long as those don't break the law -there- and even if they do you can still sell them services as that's their problem -there- not yours. per-se. ;)

now. that's just the blackmail part and just the BRD part... other eu memberstates usually have simular laws...

if you knowingly and willingly insert ips into a blackmail infrastructure which you have advertised with the argument that you KNOW a listing has impact on 1/3rd of the worlds mail delivery, or worse, such as spamhaus DROP, where you KNOW a listing causes part of the internet to completely drop that traffic, as you advertise it just for -that- purpose and know how many nodes use it, that completely falls under pretty much any computer sabotage act out there -ever-.

but... ofcourse... to you... some not-even-illegal use of 'smtp' or some wintendo virusses that could be out there, are of higher priority than keeping the internet working, and not breaking any laws yourself.

keep in mind, we, the owners of the internet, isps and carriers, and yes we do OWN it, 'tolerate' blacklists... as long as they don't go around making silly demands, such as 'contacting' them, or gaining too much influence and starting to 'demand' to disconnect things without even bothering to get a court order.

what's next... the RIAA setting up one as well?

On 31 ينا, 2017 ص 04:17, ox wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:21:54 +0000
HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker<sv...@xs4all.nl>  wrote:
smtp is just one of many protocols out there, a primitive, fairly
unimportant and severely lacking in terms of security one at that,
and it's protection cannot be a reason for any disconnection -ever-.

This thread is about DNSBL and not about the smtp protocol but the
replies helped us all understand why it is important to permanently list
entire IP ranges. (Even if the resources change hands)

Personally, I think that block times should be increased or become more
permanent.

Practically and right now, some of the block lists that I feed data
into is talking about discontinuing 24 hour blocks completely and
moving to much longer block times.

Other lists are considering completely discontinuing auto de-listing.
The effect of this will mean that abuse@ will have to become more responsive
in order to avoid being more permanently listed.

Andre











Reply via email to