All, Given the number of people who may submit a report (anyone receiving a full table from their upstream(s), assuming the accused hijack makes it into the DFZ), I'm still concerned that the proposed policy would cause more harm than good. A random AS that happens to receive the announcement isn't in an authoritative position to know if a given announcement was unauthorized. Putting them through a reporting process that might well require the disclosure of internal information because of an unrelated individual/group being suspicious is a problem.
Combined with the issues detailed in the Impact Analysis, I'm opposed to the policy as written. Jacob Slater On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:24 AM Marco Schmidt <mschm...@ripe.net> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Policy proposal 2019-03, "Resource Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation" > is now in the Review Phase. > > The goal of this proposal is to define that BGP hijacking is not > accepted as normal practice within the RIPE NCC service region. > > The proposal has been updated following the last round of discussion and > is now at version v2.0. Some of the changes made to version v1.0 include: > - Includes procedural steps for reporting and evaluation of potential > hijacks > - Provides guidelines for external experts > - Adjusted title > > The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this latest proposal > version to support the community’s discussion. You can find the full > proposal and impact analysis at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-03 > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-03#impact-analysis > > And the draft documents at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-03/draft > > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this > four week Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal, taking > the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft > RIPE Policy Document. > > At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will > determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore > important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of > your input from the previous phase. > > We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft > document and send any comments to <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> before 4 > October 2019. > > > Kind regards, > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Officer > RIPE NCC > > >
