On 26 March 2011 16:10, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wrong. The 'accept' mechanism you refer to does not exist. This is
> done in the dictionary, by setting a direction restriction on one of
> the entries.
>
> You can write a rule where a different meaning is output based on
> context, but this is done by ignoring the translation from the
> dictionary.
>
I was referring to this one. But yeah, I missed to tell the obvious way to
solving the the ambiguity. My bad. And yes, "That is what the transfer
system is for" sentence was obviously misleading, I apologize.
>
> > But that's not the case most of the time. After studying apertium's
> pipeline
> > a little more, it would be more cleared to you.
>
> I'd advise you to do the same, if you're serious about wanting to be a
> mentor.
>
Ouch :(
--
Regards
Abu Zaher Md. Faridee
http://zaher14.blogspot.com/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/apertium/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
