On 26 March 2011 10:36, Abu Zaher <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26 March 2011 16:10, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Wrong. The 'accept' mechanism you refer to does not exist. This is >> done in the dictionary, by setting a direction restriction on one of >> the entries. >> >> You can write a rule where a different meaning is output based on >> context, but this is done by ignoring the translation from the >> dictionary. > > I was referring to this one. But yeah, I missed to tell the obvious way to > solving the the ambiguity. My bad. And yes, "That is what the transfer > system is for" sentence was obviously misleading, I apologize. > >> >> > But that's not the case most of the time. After studying apertium's >> > pipeline >> > a little more, it would be more cleared to you. >> >> I'd advise you to do the same, if you're serious about wanting to be a >> mentor. > > Ouch :( >
As I told you on IRC, I didn't actually mean anything /this/ harsh -- I mean, misleading answers like this put doubt on your ability to be a successful mentor: think of how much time a student could have lost searching for this mythical 'accept'. -- <Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil. <Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
