El dl 17 de 12 de 2012 a les 17:19 +0100, en/na Per Tunedal va escriure: ... snip ...
> > Hmm, I thought that some training might cover up what wasn't manually > added, somehow. > Anyhow, what if I skip the training? Can manually added domain-info be > used by Apertium? Yes, like we suggested. You put information in the comments, then use an XSL or other script to generate the LRX files on a domain-by-domain basis. > > > --snip-- > > > > > - let the user choose a suitable domain (if any), as an alternative to > > > the "general" domain > > > > That'd be easy by giving a new translation mode, e.g. en-sv_music.mode > > would point to a different lrx file from the general en-sv.mode. > > And without training? It would work the same. The training generates rules, but you can also write rules by hand. > > > > > - let Apertium use info from the dictionaries and the training to solve > > > ambiguities. > > > > > > BTW Would it do any difference if you trained the tagger on a domain > > > corpus? > > > > It might. > > If so, can that be used for different modes of translation? Yes. F. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
