Norm, I understand your objection. However, the point I was trying to make is that the application would still work. ( AKA: There would not be any ARERR's thrown that would stop the function of the application due to application level details.)
Yes you might need to give more people float/fixed license. However those are server level things that are outside of the control of the application workflow/process. So it would not require a rework of the application after the change in submitter mode. Yes it might require more money paid to the vendor. :) However in the other condition, (Changeable to Locked) you might have to rework/change the application to avoid the server from throwing ARERR's and preventing even float/fixed licensed uses from using the application. So changing that one setting can totally break your application for NON-FREE LICENSED users. (Which is the point I was trying to make.) -- Carey Matthew Black Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP) ARS = Action Request System(Remedy) Love, then teach Solution = People + Process + Tools Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two. On 7/11/07, Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have an application that is designed for "Submitter mode" = "Locked" then it should also work fine on a server with "Submitter mode" = "Changeable" too. However the reverse is not true. ( If the application is designed for "Changeable" it _may_ not work in a "Locked" environment. ) This is not necessarily true! If you have an app that's designed to allow people with just a READ license to update their own requests--thus the app is designed to run on a SUBMITTER LOCKED server--setting the server to SUBMITTER CHANGEABLE will block those people from being able to do that.
_______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
