I understand that you aren't supported for the app if you don't upgrade
it. I just wasn't sure if there was something keeping Candace from
moving their existing HPD solution onto the ARS 7.x platform besides app
support. I didn't know if there was a core change in the ARS system that
wouldn't allow the older ITSM to work on the ARS 7.x platform.

------------- 

Dylan Wheeler
Production Control Analyst Principal 
IT Operations 
Downey Savings & Loan Association, F.A. 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Powell
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 9:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: HelpDesk Lite (was: Company Dropping Remedy)


Correct. The ARS might be 7.x, but if the apps are 5.6, you're off the
support matrix for that app.

TP

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wheeler, Dylan
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 12:46 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: HelpDesk Lite (was: Company Dropping Remedy)

I haven't looked at it yet because I have too much on my plate right now
as it is, but is it not possible to upgrade to 7.x ARS and keep the
existing HPD system? Or are you talking about falling off App as well as
ARS support?

------------- 

Dylan Wheeler
Production Control Analyst Principal 
IT Operations 
Downey Savings & Loan Association, F.A. 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Decou, Candace M
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 9:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: HelpDesk Lite (was: Company Dropping Remedy)


LOL - No Carey, but I do support another company which is a small/mid
size client. Been with them for years now really and just provide
part-time (evening/weekend) as needed support (and
upgrades/customizations when necessary).  

I so agree with what you are saying too and maybe you are right - maybe
it's time for me to look for a 5.6 Help Desk 3rd party type of
replacement for them, or build something from scratch.  I'm petty darn
sure that they can upgrade to 7.x ARS for all their custom applications,
it's only the Help Desk piece I am concerned with for them. The really
good news is that this client has managed to build applications
supporting tech support, training, test centers, engineering, RMA and
customer facing interfaces all using older ARS technology, all of which
have migrated beautifully along the normal ARS upgrade paths (currently
at 6x).  Then we slapped Help Desk on top of all that a few years ago
and everything is relatively flawless.  They just don't want to fall off
of support and I have a heck of a time trying to see that an upgrade on
the Help Desk side is to their benefit given the huge overhead of what
it is vs. what they need.


Candace DeCou

DOI Remedy Systems Analyst 
Verizon Business 
Office:  (408) 371-1112

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability. 

This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the
addressee unless otherwise indicated


-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 9:07 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: HelpDesk Lite (was: Company Dropping Remedy)

Candace,

So does BMC consider Verizon to be a Small to Medium company? :) Just
kidding.


I think the point is that the BMC OOB applications are not targeted
toward that market.

However, there are other partners (and non partners) that offer
applications built on ARS for any market for a given task.

I do not know why BMC would expect any existing ARS customer to want to
"move away" from what they already have/know to something that is (even
in the words of the vendor selling both products) "less"
powerful/robust? And then maybe move back to the product they left "when
their needs grow enough to warrant that power/robustness".

However, we can only buy what they have to sell. If it does not satisfy,
then we have no other choice but to look for something that will
satisfy. With ARS we can either buy an application from another company
or build it yourself. (At least there are options.)  I wonder if there
are any other companies out there that could sell you a "Magic based"
application to do Process "X" for your company?

If BMC does not fill the application need, then I would suggest that ARS
customers turn to other vendors that are filling the need for them.
Maybe it will still be ARS based, maybe not. But that is the "risk" that
BMC takes when they provide no other options to their customers.
(Switching from ARS to Magic or ARS to Oracle Applications may require
the same amount of effort. The customer should consider all options.) I
am sure BMC is aware of this condition. Obviously some existing
(affected) customers will not like the options they have been given. [
Pay more(ITSM v7), or do more work(switch platforms) and get less]


In short.. I think BMC is targeting "new" customers and mostly "BIG"
customers at that. So the existing and/or smaller customers "get the
leftovers" and may decide that what BMC has to offer is no longer "good
enough" for them.


Customer:
   Vote with your money.
   They will listen, or they will fade away into the distance with their
head in the sand as you move your business to greener pastures.

--
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two.


On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Decou, Candace M
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
>
> And if it is Magic based and not ARS based, does that mean an entirely

> new implementation for my small size client who needs to upgrade from 
> Help Desk 5.6?  In other words, no upgrade path from where we are to 
> where we need to go?  What will happen to the other 8 or 9 custom 
> applications currently co-residing with the Help Desk app on the same
AR server?
> I agree with Daniel - we want and need a Remedy based trimmed down 
> version of Help Desk.  Call it lite or low-caloric...I don't care.  I 
> just know some of us need it badly. Help!!  Please - and thanks for 
> listening.
> :)
>
>
>
> Candace DeCou
>
> DOI Remedy Systems Analyst
> Verizon Business
> Office:  (408) 371-1112
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> Verizon Business - global capability, personal accountability.
>
> This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the 
> addressee unless otherwise indicated

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


This message and any attachments are for the intended recipient(s) only
and may contain privileged, confidential and/or proprietary information
about Downey Savings or its customers, which Downey Savings does not
intend to disclose to the public.  If you received this message by
mistake, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message
and attachments.

________________________________________________________________________
____
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to