Hi,
The TR/DB-functionality allways does it. The problem is that the syntax
is, for some very obscure reason, not available in Active Links.
('Status' != 'DB.Status') is the exact same thing as ('Status'.changed =
1) would be. I see no point in changing the syntax, but it would be nice
to use it in Active Links.
The Hidden/Visible stuff is less useful. It can allways be tracked with a
display-only-flag. It does no great harm to do one extra Hide or Show...
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://rrr.se
> I'm going to put this in as an RFE - I highly expect to get shot down
> even though it would save a LOT of coding work at times.
>
> First though I thought I'd ask for input and criticism of the idea.
>
> Frequently I want workflow to fire on dependencies like a field being
> visible/hidden or a field value having been changed. TR/DB value
> comparisons frequently do not do it depending on what I'm trying to
> accomplish.
>
> What I'd really like to be able to do at least in Active Links is a "Run
> IF" that went something like:
>
> 'Status'.changed=1
>
> or
>
> 'Myfield".visible=0
>
> Just about every GUI coding platform I've seen has things like this.
>
> I'm also going to put in an RFE for improved logging for things like
> Dialog Open/Close field mappings, etc.
>
> Crazy requests? What say you?
>
> William Rentfrow, Principal Consultant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> C 701-306-6157
> O 952-432-0227
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>
> --
> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
