How about defaulting a hidden selection field and having an "on enter" active 
link firing condition in order to simulate the "on loaded" firing 
condition that exists today?




________________________________
From: Tim Widowfield <tim_widowfi...@yahoo.com>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 2:40:24 PM
Subject: Re: History of AR System

** 
Oh, yes.  Stacked buttons!  And server-side macros before Push Fields actions 
were possible.  Being able to dispense with all our horrid run-process macros 
was a major step forward.  Before pushes, when you sent data from one form to 
another via a filter Run Process action, it happened in phase 3.  You had no 
assurance that it would happen, and you had no control over the order in which 
they would occur.  It's hard to imagine we built "enterprise-class" 
applications on such a house of cards.

Guys, I'm having a memory lapse.  What was that workflow type or object they 
had back in version 1....  Something like Administrative Action?  I can't even 
remember what it was for.

--Tim





________________________________
From: "Frank, Gordon M. (CMS/CTR)" <gordon.fr...@cms.hhs.gov>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 10:36:10 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] History of AR System

How about actual Macros which do the same thing on three different
platforms (Windows, UNIX and MAC)!!!!!

We forget the days of now Open Window or stacked buttons.

Gordon M. Frank
Remedy Skilled Professional
ITIL V3 Certified
Lockheed Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 9:47 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: History of AR System

You know what would be fun ??? -- Screenshots from the early days.

Anybody have a screenshot -- X-Windows admin, etc... Or License Tool ???

-John




On Jun 26, 2009, at 11:54 PM, Eric Bergan wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Bloom
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:47 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: History of AR System
>
> Let us not forget 1.1 also brought us a system that worked.
> I thought it was Nov. 1992.
>
> Esacalations was the first major improvement to me.
> Somehow saying there is a work around and we could use cron tables
> Never quite did it for me (even if it was more efficient than
> escalations at
> the time).

    You mean you didn't really need all that snap to grid,
boxes/text
trim, grouping, some hope that the Motif/Windows/Mac/ASCII views  
looked the
same? Boy, could we have saved some time...

> There is a good trivia question:
> Who brought the phrase "there is a work around"
> into every day usage for us Remedy Folks?
>
> Not that it wasn't a phrase well worth paying attention to :-)

    Now you're just fishing for a response... :-)

                Eric Bergan

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers  
Are"

--
John David Sundberg
235 East 6th Street, Suite 400B
St. Paul, MN 55101
(651) 556-0930-work
(651) 247-6766-cell
(651) 695-8577-fax
john.sundb...@kineticdata.com

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_




_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to