--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I agree the developement is atleast 1 year behind schedule. Just
trying to point out a positive
Point taken. Ordinarily one might not be concerned but with the history
of Fishman, and the fact that no financially-backed plans are in place,
you can't help thinking that what you see is what you get. I woould
find it easier to give credit where credit is due in this case if the
above were in place. Every taxpayer should be howling about this. I can
only assume that most just don't care that the bw looks the way it
does, or that they simply trust Fishman to do the right thing. That's
okay if they want to trust someone with their own assets, but not the
public's. Where's the plan, performance bonds, etc.?
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
