At 8:36 PM -0500 2/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Due to the unprecedented whining and gnashing of teeth directed at Asbury
>Radio's numerous staff over the perceived-to-be-rotten transmission quality of
>recent archived shows,
I have to question your objectivity here Maureen. If you think that the
complaints (some from me) about the sound quality of the archived shows being
"rotten" (your words) are merely perceived then you need to get your hearing
checked. I've listened to the new archive of the Feb 2 program and the
difference between it and the previously posted one is like the difference
between night and day. There is no perception that the quality was rotten. It
was rotten. On the previous version, the voices were virtually unintelligible
and, for the most part, Councilman Johnson was not even audible at all. In the
new version, everything is as crisp and as clear as it can be for this type of
audio streaming.
(I have both files if anyone wants to hear the difference)
I thank you for doing whatever it is you did to make the quality better. But at
the same time, you need to just own up to the fact that the archived audio
sucked and not blame your listeners for their "perceptions." And I apologize
if my attempts at prodding you to raise the bar on your own program were
thought to be "unprecedented whining and gnashing of teeth" ... that won't
happen again.
~Joe
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
