Seems like the people upset with Jim is getting to be a pretty
diverse group. Can they all be wrong?
Any thought at all that maybe he isn't conducting himself very well?
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> <justifiedright@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <dfsavgny@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Jim holds a B.S. in Psychology from St. Joseph's University
> >
> > BS sums it up...
>
>
> meaning what?
>
> > I taught school for 2 years. Shall I rush into your children's
> > school, outside of the curriculum, and start learnin' 'em?
>
> Was he giving instruction?
>
> >
> > He could have more training than the Pope (probably thinks he
> does).
> > He isn't part of the curriculum and not accepted by the school
to
> > teach there.
>
> Was he teaching? Did he receive permission from the principal?
>
> > He wasn't there for show and tell.
>
>
> > I took Keady at his word and worked under the assumption that he
> did
> > have the principal's permission. Why should I investigate - do
> you
> > think he is lying?
>
> Nice try. You suggested that Keady used undue influence. Muscle I
> think is the word you used.
>
> > I believe he needs the Super's permission. Don't be surprised
if
> > principal or super cover for themselves and him and "start to
> think
> > they kinda remember something about the Super saying sorta OK or
> > something."
>
> I don't thinkhe broke into the school. Some official let him do
it.
> If they were not supposed to that is their problem, not his.
>
> >
> > Are you suggesting that the principal would let anyone in to
talk
> to
> > the kids just for the asking? They let Jim in because of his
> > Council position.
>
> No, because they thought it was a good idea. Keady goes to the
> schools to talk to the kids about the shooting to try to some good
> and again, gets crucified. Why, because he is a councilman? Oh
> right, he is grand standing again.
>
> If you don't have your head up someone's (the right someone) ass
in
> City Hall, drink the kool aid and sing the company song (Oh Status
> Quo), you're grand standing in this city.
>
> Meanwhile, Sanders, Loffredo and Bruno haven't met a photo op they
> don't like. Loffredo can dress up us Columbus and get marooned on
> the beach, you dress your kids up as First Peoples (but I bet you
> like to call them injuns) and Bruno can pontificate about absolute
> bullshit but that's okay.
>
> >
> > You continue to make that charge. I'm sorry I offended you. I
> > didn't know you were gay.
>
> I'm not gay and the charge fits. I just want to show the level you
> will stoop to do what you see fit. The ends do not justify the
means.
>
> >
> > It is part of the public record. You'll see it in all the papers
> > tomorrow.
>
>
> I am sure I will. Does no one see the coincidence here? Like or
> dislike Keady, agree or disagree with him, this is payback for
> something. I make no charge against the school board and will take
> them at their word, but this letter on the heels of the UEZ letter
> just seems fishy to me.
>
> Perhaps the letter will indicate what Keady did wrong. I hope it
has
> some substance relating to what the Board objects to in what Keady
> may have said to the children. Because if it is solely charging
that
> he had no authority to go into the schools, if he got permission
> from the principal then the issue should be between the Board and
> the principal.
>
> Seems to me like the guy contributes a lot of time to run programs
> for kids to keep them on the straight and narrow and is now
getting
> tarred and feathered for trying to do some good for the kids after
> the shooting. I didn't criticize the Board for closing the schools
> after the shooting although many did. I think Keady did question
> that as well in the press. Is this payback? Is he an easy target?
>
> This City is getting like communist China. You have people afraid
to
> identify themselves because of retribution. You have a UEZ
> overstepping its bounds. Anyone who tries to do good and WHO is
not
> paying homage to the powers that be, gets slammed. I have first
hand
> experience on that. "Go Along to Get Along" should be the City
motto.
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
