So you really are making the case that Jim Keady is right and the rest of the City is wrong.
Says alot. --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" > <justifiedright@> wrote: > > > > > > Seems like the people upset with Jim is getting to be a pretty > > diverse group. Can they all be wrong? > > > > Any thought at all that maybe he isn't conducting himself very > well? > > > Glad you asked. Firstly, I read the article. Seems like he is in the > clear and had permission. If the schools did not internally follow > protocol, well..... > > Greater "wrongs" have been done by public officials in AP and there > has been NO outcry from anyone except the appointed "naysayers." > Groups like the UEZ, etc., have remained mute while councilmembers > have lied in print and public meetings. Said nothing while accepted > redevelopment plans were ignored and voided. I could go on. All who > drink at the trough of City Hall put their hands over their > collective mouths, eyes and ears because it was deemed the "greater > good" by their masters. > > Don't think I do not know how far the influence of Loffredo and > Bruno goes in this city. You yourself don't say what you know is > wrong in public because of it, although you have said it at times in > private (BTW, I expect your GUMBA article to be here today if not in > TCN). > > Keady was considered a great guy by many as he spoke against eminent > domain, tried to save buildings and to get Partners to move their > asses. > > What went wrong? Well, he started to speak about serving the poor, > the downtrodden. The claims against Keady have been posted right > here all along. A diverse group - those against him politically - > and others, such as those with real estate interests - brokers, > agents, owners, etc., join opinion with you that he will make this > city nothing but soup kitchens and homeless shelters if he had his > way. Weren't those your words? > > That is his crime. The fear is that he will keep this town down and > reduce our property values. Didn't Allan come right out and say that? > > And so, you get people who have influence on official boards to join > the fray. Doesn't matter what the facts are, as along as there is an > opportunity to criticize him. It is clear that the powers that be, > both inside and outside of City Hall, want Keady gone. > > Keady's announcement of what he is doing in his official capacity is > interpreted as "grandstanding" instead of being accepted as it is > given - fulfilling his obligation to keep his constituents apprised. > > He is proactive. Thank God. The group that has mobilized against him > are a bunch of cheerleaders. Everything is show,parades, fireworks, > faux landings of lost explorers,etc. Tom, next Columbus Day take > your show to Howell. Let yourkids participate there where they live > and go to school. > > I won't criticize the School Board because I don't know everything > and I know there are good people in it. But reading about events > over the past few years and the ongoing performance of the schools, > I would say that Bob DiSanto and the board have their hands full. > There is plenty of blame to go around concerning the schools. They > should be addressing more important matters than Keady visiting the > school. It all seems a bit heavy-handed and a coincidence on the > heels of the UEZ letter. > > I would say that all of our councilman and mayor, and city manager, > should have considered visiting the school in the wake of the > shootings. But I don't think I would want Bruno talking to my kids. > > It is time for people to wake up. Keady is not going to do anything > to reduce our property values. They are more in danger of declining > due to the potential failure of the redevelopment and Partners > continual postponement of the waterfront restoration. > > A lot of people (real estate people) made a lot of money in this > town over the past few years. I see their hand in this. Shame on you > all. > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/