So you really are making the case that Jim Keady is right and the
rest of the City is wrong.
Says alot.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> <justifiedright@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Seems like the people upset with Jim is getting to be a pretty
> > diverse group. Can they all be wrong?
> >
> > Any thought at all that maybe he isn't conducting himself very
> well?
>
>
> Glad you asked. Firstly, I read the article. Seems like he is in
the
> clear and had permission. If the schools did not internally follow
> protocol, well.....
>
> Greater "wrongs" have been done by public officials in AP and
there
> has been NO outcry from anyone except the appointed "naysayers."
> Groups like the UEZ, etc., have remained mute while councilmembers
> have lied in print and public meetings. Said nothing while
accepted
> redevelopment plans were ignored and voided. I could go on. All
who
> drink at the trough of City Hall put their hands over their
> collective mouths, eyes and ears because it was deemed
the "greater
> good" by their masters.
>
> Don't think I do not know how far the influence of Loffredo and
> Bruno goes in this city. You yourself don't say what you know is
> wrong in public because of it, although you have said it at times
in
> private (BTW, I expect your GUMBA article to be here today if not
in
> TCN).
>
> Keady was considered a great guy by many as he spoke against
eminent
> domain, tried to save buildings and to get Partners to move their
> asses.
>
> What went wrong? Well, he started to speak about serving the poor,
> the downtrodden. The claims against Keady have been posted right
> here all along. A diverse group - those against him politically -
> and others, such as those with real estate interests - brokers,
> agents, owners, etc., join opinion with you that he will make this
> city nothing but soup kitchens and homeless shelters if he had his
> way. Weren't those your words?
>
> That is his crime. The fear is that he will keep this town down
and
> reduce our property values. Didn't Allan come right out and say
that?
>
> And so, you get people who have influence on official boards to
join
> the fray. Doesn't matter what the facts are, as along as there is
an
> opportunity to criticize him. It is clear that the powers that be,
> both inside and outside of City Hall, want Keady gone.
>
> Keady's announcement of what he is doing in his official capacity
is
> interpreted as "grandstanding" instead of being accepted as it is
> given - fulfilling his obligation to keep his constituents
apprised.
>
> He is proactive. Thank God. The group that has mobilized against
him
> are a bunch of cheerleaders. Everything is show,parades,
fireworks,
> faux landings of lost explorers,etc. Tom, next Columbus Day take
> your show to Howell. Let yourkids participate there where they
live
> and go to school.
>
> I won't criticize the School Board because I don't know everything
> and I know there are good people in it. But reading about events
> over the past few years and the ongoing performance of the
schools,
> I would say that Bob DiSanto and the board have their hands full.
> There is plenty of blame to go around concerning the schools. They
> should be addressing more important matters than Keady visiting
the
> school. It all seems a bit heavy-handed and a coincidence on the
> heels of the UEZ letter.
>
> I would say that all of our councilman and mayor, and city
manager,
> should have considered visiting the school in the wake of the
> shootings. But I don't think I would want Bruno talking to my kids.
>
> It is time for people to wake up. Keady is not going to do
anything
> to reduce our property values. They are more in danger of
declining
> due to the potential failure of the redevelopment and Partners
> continual postponement of the waterfront restoration.
>
> A lot of people (real estate people) made a lot of money in this
> town over the past few years. I see their hand in this. Shame on
you
> all.
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
