Dan I agree with you, however if municipalities didn't draw first blood
for over a decade the religious institutions would not have had any
success when we lobbied the summer of 2000 for the Religious Land Use
act. (RLUIPA 2000)
Than there is that one sacred question; how do we interpret "no laws
shall be abled to hinder the free excersise of religious activities. I
am all for making sure the facility is safe for the public, the contest
here is "do you allow" even those that are safe to the public. The
Uniform commercial code has not been around as long as the major laws.
Code is arbitrary, capricious and abused in many communities. Code
enforcement officials are almost always political appointees.
KB
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Kevin Brown" <jerseykev@> wrote:
> >
> > You really need to read the First Amendment of The United States
> > Consitution, and I would suggest reading The 14 th "Free Excersize
> > Clause" as well as The Religious Land Use & INstitutionalised
Persons
> > Act of 2000, which by the way, was signed by Former President
Clinton.
> >
> > Check to see if any local church in Asbury Park has a merchantile
> > license, as well.
>
> The cloak of religion should not be allowed to flout rules, laws, and
> regulations that others must follow. Denying variances for valid
> purposes would not interfere with "their" practice of religion.
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
