[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
But almost every AG (attorney general) across the country has contacted me and has provdided content. did you ever read all the studies about all the scholl books that are wrong See also Excerpt from NYT magazine a few weeks ago: The tricky thing is, the process by which Wikipedia usually, eventually gets things right — the notion that mistakes in a given entry, whether intentional or unintentional, will ultimately be caught and repaired as a function of the project’s massive, egalitarian oversight — doesn’t seem as if it would work when people are looking for information about events unfolding in real time. How on earth can anyone be trusted to get the story right when any version of the story is only as accurate, or even as serious, as the last anonymous person to log on and rewrite it? Nothing is easier than taking shots at Wikipedia, and its many mistakes (most often instances of deliberate vandalism) are schadenfreude’s most renewable resource. But given the chaotic way in which it works, the truly remarkable thing about Wikipedia as a news site is that it works as well as it does. Full text: _Click here: Wikipedia - Computers and the Internet - Encyclopedias - News and News Media - New York Times_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/01/magazine/01WIKIPEDIA-t.html?ei=5070&en=6eb7f669a27abd53&ex=1185940800&adxnnl=1&pagewanted =all&adxnnlx=1185824602-tCw1XliGq52hxJq16HB2ng) ========================== Not even Camden has the desolute pictures that AP has: _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camden%2C_New_Jersey_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camden,_New_Jersey) ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
