--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Jennifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
>
> 
> Less money is lost by the lender in a loan modification/short 
refinance 

Exactly.

1. Eliminate the foreclosures eliminate the lawyer.

2. They are going to "donate" or sell for low cost. Most likely 
vacant homes doesn't pay for them to hang on to and pay taxes and 
care. Clean the books and move on while the gov's paying.

3. No sense in taking back homes that are so far out of the money. 
Then they have to show the foreclosures on the books making the bad 
decisons even worse. Let someone stay in the home and take care of it 
for as long as they can - the bank gets some money every month vs 
nothing nor anything of value. Keeps the books clean and looks goo to 
the media. 

4. It keeps the laywers from suing the banks for "misleading" someone 
into thinking they can afford the home the person signed for swearing 
they can pay for it even after they go out and buy two new cars and 
throw a swimming pool in. 

5. Does nothing for non owner occuppied homes. Second homes etc. The 
best thing to do is get a divorce if you're married and each bury 
yourself in a home ...

It's something to help those that can and will try to pay.


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to