Sorry to interrupt. By proximity, I should have taken the cue from the
otherside. Quirk of fate made me fall prey to the guiles of Uzanbazar.
Dilip/Dil Deka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "PS: O' Pai, Kelei baaru eneke
mwk eneke 'chance' di thako, koswn." ---
That is half the fun. Ene usotwa budhi xorute uzanbozarot xika.
Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Don't be afraid of the screamers and the preachers in the net. Say
your piece when you want to.
If I had access to such insightful advice, I would SELL them, for a big fat
fee, by the word.
What a shame you give it away, for FREE.
:-)
PS: O' Pai, Kelei baaru eneke mwk eneke 'chance' di thako, koswn.
At 9:09 AM -0700 10/3/07, Dilip/Dil Deka wrote:
Don't be afraid of the screamers and the preachers in the net. Say your piece
when you want to. Dilip Deka
uttam borthakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When two parties talk, be it in catechism mode or a dialogue, it is
inevitable that they would represent divers interests. Is there any
pre-condition for proselytisation? Now, if the interests are so antgonistic
that there is no point in beginning the discourse, then why should someone
start a response cycle at all? Does Pakistan have to run a check on India
while entering a dialogue or impose a pre-condition for conversion? Let
everyone have his say. Each would find for himself, what is acceptable and what
is not? I do not find any substance in the search for sincerity or any comment
thereon. Intelligentsia or not, every human being capable of communicating
through the net is intelligent enough to find what is good for him and what is
not. What is saintly sermon for Mr. Laden may be blasphemy for Mr. Bush.
Intelligentsia is not a defined monolith. What is intelligentsia for one may
not be so for another. Is there any scope for normative preachings
here?
Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before we pass judgement on the response, we also ought to be able to judge
the QUESTION.
What were the questions posed by Utpal designed to ?
To help him and others decide, if what ULFA has been fighting for, Assam's
sovereignty, is a sound and beneficial move for Assam? And if they are
persuaded by ULFA's response that they are sound, Utpal and others would
SUPPORT it?
Or were they designed to extract an admission from ULFA, that their own
notions and beliefs, that it is patently bad for Assam, never mind HOW or WHY
they have concluded that their notions and beliefs are the truly wise and
considered opinions?
Is it therefore REASONABLE to evaluate INTENT for ULFA before submitting
itself to the INQUISITION?
Where is the ORDINARY integrity expected of the intelligentsia here, if one
can misuse the English word under the circumstances? The sincerity of purpose?
It is obvious that those who consider themselves the 'educated' and'wise',
unlike ULFA, and who parade around wearing the garbs of pillars-of society do
not think so and thus the eloquent outpourings of disappointment, not to
mention the offenses to their genteel sensitivities . Not just that, the
self-fulfilling prophecies too of the band of braves indulging in the "hola
gosot baagi kuthar mora" enterprise, justification why their masters don't talk
to them, or should not.
What is missing from the exercises is a rudimentary element of AIM of
GOALS. Never mind the need to explore the reasons WHY ten thousand plus
Oxomiyas have given their lives. No doubt their lives were nearly not as
valuable as one Sanjoy Ghosh's.
Aimless exercises unfortunately lead to nowhere. With such pillars of
society looking after its well-being, one hardly needs enemies to tear it down.
cm
At 11:19 AM +0530 10/3/07, shantikam hazarika wrote:
It seems that some of us are being branded as part of an "unhappy gang with
their so-called education". And they would be 'selective' in answering their
questions; which means they would only reply to 'sincere' questions, from 'real
questioners' after their 'background check done'.
Well, in case they have to do a background check in my case, let me tell you
that my life has been an open book and if a background check is requird in my
case, it simly shows how much these people are in touch with reality or the
ground situations.
Incidentally, let me also tell, that there has been enough background checks
done about these people, their cohorts, sympathisers, beneficiaries,
supporters, hangers one and what not. Lot of people already know who benefits
from their actions, who are actually propping them up. For example when they
killed Sanjay Ghosh, it did not require much background check to find out why
they did so, what was the nexus behind that sordid deal and who would be the
real losers if Majuli is genuinely saved in a very cost effective manner.
Obviously, they are buying time to prepare some obfuscating response, what we
may call "saale bere kobowa" reply in the name of background checks and what
not.
Also they have already said that they would ignore "halfwit questions and
questioners". How more selective can your comfort zone be...
Interestingly, I was reading something today and I came across the follwoing
phrase: The truth is that many terrorists are doing very well out of violence.
Extortion rackets give them a lifestyle they cannot aspire in times of peace.
They have money, excitement and status: what more you seek in life?
Mantabya nisproyojan.
Shantikam Hazarika
Director,
Assam Institute of Management
PO Box 30, GUWAHATI 781001, India
HOME PAGE: www.aimguwahati.edu.in
---------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:17:14 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: assam@assamnet.org
Subject: Re: [Assam] assam Digest, Vol 26, Issue 66
To: assamonline
ULFA invites genuine sincere questions from persons(not gangs) not
happy with their so-called education ,wanting to KNOW how to fight and win
their great future in sovereign Assam .
Firstly we will have background checks done on real (?) questioners. Please
tolerate delays.
ULFA will ignore halfwit questions and questioners who think they already
know and are already bonded mentally or monetarily.
With Best Regards to respectable Assamonliners,
Rubi
--------------------
---------------------------------
Call friends with PC-to-PC calling -- FREE Try it now!
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Uttam Kumar Borthakur
---------------------------------
Get the freedom to save as many mails as you wish. Click here to know
how._______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Uttam Kumar Borthakur
---------------------------------
Why delete messages? Unlimited storage is just a click away.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org