Why don't you tell us  which?

Are you not upto it?









At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>  >But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it
>is the
>COMPREHENSION of it.
>
>>I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply (
>>to anyone who
>>reads and comprehends ordinary English)
>
>
>Hmmm .... a different argument then "Yet another
>PSEUDO scientific account"   OR  "unadulterated
>garbage".
>
>With such rapid shift in arguments,  we,  the
>half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true --
>
>1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific
>OR
>2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage
>OR
>3) Fed research materials are correct but we are
>unable to comprehend it.
>OR
>All three above
>
>>   >If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there
>may
>>be more garbage) ,  it implies that ---
>
>
>
>>**** There may very well be. Is that unthinkable?
>
>
>>But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it
>is the
>COMPREHENSION of it.
>
>>I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply (
>>to anyone who
>>reads and comprehends ordinary English)
>>that  the SW monsoons  go to the NE but cannot drop
>>its load there,
>>so it veers westwards
>>and trudging over the Gangetic plains  unloads it at
>>Dilli and
>Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what
>have you
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 9:37 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
>wrote:
>>I have no arguments regarding the monsoon pattern. I
>>do not think that I have enough knowledge to
>>authoratitively speak on this subject, more so,
>since
>>my school education (Desi School education that is
>:-)
>>) agrees to what you mentioned.
>>
>>However,  the concern here is the site from where
>this
>>has been picked up.
>>
>>I find the following statements in that site ---
>>
>>1) This Web site contains the online versions of
>books
>>previously published (1988-98) in hard copy by the
>>Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress
>>under the Country Studies/Area Handbook Program
>>sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army.
>>
>>2) The Federal Research Division provides customized
>>research and analytical services on domestic and
>>international subjects to agencies of the United
>>States Government, the District of Columbia, and
>>authorized Federal contractors on a cost-recovery
>>basis.
>>
>>If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may
>>be more garbage) ,  it implies that ---
>>
>>1) Federal Research Division   published garbage
>under
>>a program sponsored by US Army
>>
>>2) Any Tom, Dick Harry can write a piece of garbage
>>and get it published by Federal Research Division 
>>
>>3) The agencies of US Government and Federal
>>Contractors are fed with such garbage.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary
>>>>of Congress does
>>>>not in any way, shape or form guarantee its
>>>>accuracy,  veracity ,
>>>>usefulness or any such other quality.
>>
>>>>It is like a storage vault, a library. In a library
>>>>you can get works
>>>>of genius as well as unadulterated garbage.
>>
>>>>Is that hard to imagine, that you would  argue the
>>point?
>>
>>
>>
>>>>About the issue involved does it need high
>>scientific training to
>>>>imagine that the SW Monsoons  that travel to Assam
>>retraces its
>>>>steps because there was no one home to receive the
>>order?  So it
>>>>returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli?
>>
>>
>>>>What kind of a moron would argue such a point, tell
>>me?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>At 8:26 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
>>wrote:
>>>    >>**** Yet another PSEUDO scientific account,  of
>>the
>>>>>tanker truck
>>>>>driver.  But if you want to stake your monsoon
>>>>>expertise on it, so be
>>>>>it!
>>>
>>>C'da,
>>>I am not an expert in Monsoon and in fact my school
>>>knowledge had been like what is mentioned by you
>>>(Western Ghat and Eastern Ghat).
>>>
>>>However,  the piece of info which has been cited by
>>>Umesh is Originally from "Library of Congress" --
>  >>http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+in0035)
>>>
>>>
>>>Shall we consider this as "Yet another PSEUDO
>>>scientific account" ???  Or perhaps LoC hired some
>>ad
>>>agency copywriter who probably graduated
>>>from a desi school/college sporting the name of some
>>>Christian saint ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The southwest monsoon occurs in two branches. After
>>>breaking on the
>>>>southern part of the Peninsula in early June, the
>>>branch known as
>>>>the Arabian Sea monsoon reaches Bombay around June
>>>10, and it has
>>>>settled over most of South Asia by late June,
>>>bringing cooler but
>>>>more humid weather. The other branch, known as the
>>>Bay of Bengal
>>>>monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and
>>>spreads over most
>>>>of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering
>>>the barrier of
>>>>the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward
>>   >along the
>>>>Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter
>the
>>>two branches
>>>>merge as a single current bringing rains to the
>>>remaining parts of
>>>>North India in July.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>**** Yet another PSEUDO scientific account,  of
>the
>>>>>tanker truck
>>>>>driver.  But if you want to stake your monsoon
>>>>>expertise on it, so be
>>>>>it!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>At 8:17 PM -0700 10/17/07, umesh sharma wrote:
>>>>"The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal
>>>monsoon, moves
>>>>northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over
>most
>>>of Assam by the
>>>>first week of June. On encountering the barrier of
>>>the Great
>>>>Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the
>>>Indo-Gangetic
>>>>Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches
>>>merge as a
>>>>single current bringing rains to the remaining
>parts
>>>of North India
>>>>in July."  Source of the website info is CIA
>>>WorldFact Book and
>>>>Library of Congress -USA
>>>>http://www.photius.com/countries/india/climate/india_climate_climate.html
>>>>Cheers
>>>>
>>>>umesh
>>
>>
>>
>>      
>>____________________________________________________________________________________
>>Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here
>and Now (it's
>>updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
>>http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
>
>>
>
>
>
>       
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search
>that gives answers, not web links.
>http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC
>
>_______________________________________________
>assam mailing list
>assam@assamnet.org
>http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to