Looks like
you are not interested in discussing the problems, but want to go
straight for the solutions.
*** What is your rationale for coming to this conclusion? Is it something
you picked up from between the lines of what I have been writing, inferred it,
or culled it from otherwise clearly expressed intents on my part?
If you thought I will respond to your
meaningless questions, I am sorry. There is no point to go over this again.
I don't want to bore the net by repeating our discussion on the problems of
Assam that we had couple of months ago. Let you and the net make whatever
opinion want to make.
Moreover, I don't want to waste my time
any more in this meaningless theortical discussions. You have been at the least
a hindrance to many of our constructive discissions with your GBW like twisted
logics. I don't care for your opinion any more.
So I say bye bye.
Hobo Diok
Khuda Hafiz
Thanks
Rajen
A Kharkhwa Intellectual
Dhwd
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:50
AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Rickshaw pullers,
labourers go missing - IANS
At 10:48 PM -0500 5/24/05, Barua25 wrote:
May we know what do you think is Assam's problem and what is
your proposed solution then?
*** I don't have
Assam's PROBLEM all neatly packaged in a few sentences of platitudes that
you seem to require. I don't look at it in that simple-minded way. Besides I
do not either claim or pretend to know about ALL that ails
Assam.
I know of SOME
issues, and I have written about them for a decade in Assam
Net.
If you missed them
so far, you will never get it.
If you mean
this last decade, looks like I missed it completely and will never get
it.
*** That is very perceptive of you Rajen.
Looks like
you are not interested in discussing the problems, but want to go
straight for the solutions.
*** What is your rationale for coming to this conclusion? Is it something
you picked up from between the lines of what I have been writing, inferred it,
or culled it from otherwise clearly expressed intents on my part?
Why I ask the question is that I see absolutely no connection between
what I wrote in recent days or even earlier and this conclusion on your
part.
I do know that I refused to engage in YOUR invitation to engage in
pinning down Assam's PROBLEM/S sometime back. And there was a good reason for
it.
The reason was that I hold a pretty dim view of your analytical
skills, which you demonstrated graphically yesterday with :
Now we all know the
problem.
First precondition for someone to
be a Dhwd, he/she will have to have enough to eat without
working.
Assamese are typically called whose
'akalw nai, bhoralw nai' jati, and that is why they are Dhwd.
Dhwds are not poor. Assamese are
xom.bhranto dhwds.
Now here is the contradiction. If
Assamese have enough to eat without working, What is then Assam's problem?
What Assamese are complaining of? Why they are complaining of
jobs?
Are they complaining because others
are working from their waste land and trying to survive and in the process are
becoming richer than the Assamese. Are Assamese trying to say, you
Orias, you Biharis, you Bangladesis, you starve to death in your own land.
Don't you come to my waste land and try to survive.
If some Marwaris, Biharis, Bangladesis
are exploiting the Asamese, they are exploiting by following
manner:
Twmare barir bah
gaj
Take-ni korisw
khorisa
Twmake besi dhan dwn
loisw
Kothatw mon
korisa.
*** If I proposed things like the above would you consider my analytical
skills to be anything you would want to associate with?
Like
GWB would have said,"I don't know the problem, But I know the soultion:
Iraq War."
What a
great idea. Go for it.
Rajen
*** Ouch! You sure know how to hurt a fellow Oxomiya.
c
