*** What is your rationale for coming to this conclusion? Is it something you picked up from between the lines of what I have been writing, inferred it, or culled it from otherwise clearly expressed intents on my part?
If you thought I will respond to your meaningless questions, I am sorry.
*** Is it really a meaningless question? Just because you cannot
answer it does
does not make it meaningless, nor does it become
incomprehensible.
Moreover, I don't want to
waste my time any more in this meaningless theortical
discussions.
*** This amounts to the pot calling the kettle black. Just look
at YOUR 'practical' problem statement and solution prescriptions. If
those are 'practical' or even 'theoretical' I will have to agree I
don't belong to your planet.
I have this urge to say 'tothastu' or amen to your desires, but I
don't want to give the impression that I wish you to leave the
NET.
Even though I take a very 'dim view of your analytical skills',
that is specific to the Assam and India related political issues only.
I should have made that clear. But I continue to, and I think I
will in the future, hold those other intelligent and constructive
points of views, analytical commentary etc. of yours on other
issues that pertain to us NRAs and our fellow men in Assam, like I
always did.
Therefore, I hope you won't take our deep and irreconcilable
differences on issues related to Assam's political rights, its
relations to Indian political rule, Assamese rights to
self-determinaton etc. personally, and we could continue to work
together for the common good in areas where our ideas and beliefs
converge.
Take care.
With the best of personal regards, as always,
c
At 9:17 AM -0500 5/25/05, Rajen Barua wrote:
Looks like you are not interested in discussing the problems, but want to go straight for the solutions.
*** What is your rationale for coming to this conclusion? Is it something you picked up from between the lines of what I have been writing, inferred it, or culled it from otherwise clearly expressed intents on my part?
If you thought I will respond to your meaningless questions, I am sorry. There is no point to go over this again. I don't want to bore the net by repeating our discussion on the problems of Assam that we had couple of months ago. Let you and the net make whatever opinion want to make.
Moreover, I don't want to waste my time any more in this meaningless theortical discussions. You have been at the least a hindrance to many of our constructive discissions with your GBW like twisted logics. I don't care for your opinion any more.
So I say bye bye.
Hobo Diok
Khuda Hafiz
Thanks
Rajen
A Kharkhwa Intellectual Dhwd
----- Original Message -----
From: Chan MahantaTo: Barua25 ; mridul bhuyan ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [email protected]Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:50 AMSubject: Re: [Assam] Rickshaw pullers, labourers go missing - IANSAt 10:48 PM -0500 5/24/05, Barua25 wrote:
May we know what do you think is Assam's problem and what is your proposed solution then?
*** I don't have Assam's PROBLEM all neatly packaged in a few sentences of platitudes that you seem to require. I don't look at it in that simple-minded way. Besides I do not either claim or pretend to know about ALL that ails Assam.
I know of SOME issues, and I have written about them for a decade in Assam Net.
If you missed them so far, you will never get it.
If you mean this last decade, looks like I missed it completely and will never get it.
*** That is very perceptive of you Rajen.
Looks like you are not interested in discussing the problems, but want to go straight for the solutions.
*** What is your rationale for coming to this conclusion? Is it something you picked up from between the lines of what I have been writing, inferred it, or culled it from otherwise clearly expressed intents on my part?Why I ask the question is that I see absolutely no connection between what I wrote in recent days or even earlier and this conclusion on your part.I do know that I refused to engage in YOUR invitation to engage in pinning down Assam's PROBLEM/S sometime back. And there was a good reason for it.The reason was that I hold a pretty dim view of your analytical skills, which you demonstrated graphically yesterday with :Now we all know the problem.First precondition for someone to be a Dhwd, he/she will have to have enough to eat without working.Assamese are typically called whose 'akalw nai, bhoralw nai' jati, and that is why they are Dhwd.Dhwds are not poor. Assamese are xom.bhranto dhwds.Now here is the contradiction. If Assamese have enough to eat without working, What is then Assam's problem? What Assamese are complaining of? Why they are complaining of jobs?Are they complaining because others are working from their waste land and trying to survive and in the process are becoming richer than the Assamese. Are Assamese trying to say, you Orias, you Biharis, you Bangladesis, you starve to death in your own land. Don't you come to my waste land and try to survive.If some Marwaris, Biharis, Bangladesis are exploiting the Asamese, they are exploiting by following manner:Twmare barir bah gajTake-ni korisw khorisaTwmake besi dhan dwn loiswKothatw mon korisa.*** If I proposed things like the above would you consider my analytical skills to be anything you would want to associate with?
Like GWB would have said,"I don't know the problem, But I know the soultion: Iraq War."
What a great idea. Go for it.
Rajen
*** Ouch! You sure know how to hurt a fellow Oxomiya.c
_______________________________________________ Assam mailing list [email protected] http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
Mailing list FAQ: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html To unsubscribe or change options: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
