Hi M,
>If Santanu hope for a revolution for independance of Assam,
our outlooks are >definitely poles apart.
*** I will give you a far less abhorrent option: How about real
reforms, that would live up to the concept of a federal,democratic
republic, promised at independence? Would that still not keep you
apart from Santanu's hopes, considering that you imply surrendering or
unquestioning subservience to a corrupted state of the union? I hope I
misunderstood your wishes Mridul :-).
>But, BTW which Assam we are talking about? Is it the leftover
after Bodos, >Rajbangshis, Laloongs, Kerbis, Tai-Ahoms, Mataks have
their share of Assam?
*** Let us, for arguments' sake, say it is without all of them?
What then?
How does India justify creating the false federalism of creating
autonomous states who have no means to support themselves? Is it or is
it not a ploy to create dependencies who could be held under a tight
rein by Delhi, on whose largesse they are wholly dependent?
And if it is a ploy, why are they pursuing it? What is the
rationale? How do YOU accept it knowingly? Of course you could be
excused if you are unaware of it, which most netters are. And if you
wish to understand these issues, read Sanjib Baruah's Durable
Disorder. That is what made it clear for me.
But the bottom line is this: The ethnic Assamese cannot afford to
play the Hindu chauvinism card of discarding their brethren: the
Bodos, the Karbis, the Misings, the Rajbongxis. Those who did, made a
serious mistake. And those who advocate shoving Assamese language down
their throats as the state language a-la-Bengal, ought to learn
better.
>Besides, why do you call it a 'surrender'? I was born in 1962
in Assam, which >was a part of India.
*** So? If you are unable to see that you are being used or are
taken advantage of, willingly, or out of ignorance, how would you
characterize your stance? Loyalty or patriotism or surrendering to
exploitation?
>A true engineer should believe in 'deriving' not in
'assuming' facts.
*** No doubt, and my argument exactly :-).
c-da
At 3:12 PM +0530 6/9/05, mridul bhuyan wrote:
Dear Chan Da,
Something however tells me that Santanu and Mridul had polar
>opposite outlook to things. Santanu's holds on to hope for change,
>while Mridul's surrenders to Indian 'constitutional sanctity', thus
>acquiesces to the unfairness to Assam.
>
>Am I right :-)?
There is no need to bring in that innocent 'something' to tell you that. :) If Santanu hope for a revolution for independance of Assam, our outlooks are definitely poles apart. However, I'll be the happiest of all if somehow Assam becomes independent. But, BTW which Assam we are talking about? Is it the leftover after Bodos, Rajbangshis, Laloongs, Kerbis, Tai-Ahoms, Mataks have their share of Assam? Which districts or rather towns or villages will be part of that Assam. Will the believers of independance for Assam will tell me? I am not that 'optimistic' to live under the illusion that one day the sun will rise in the west. I also don't believe that those goups who indulge in bloodbath of their innocent brothers & sisters & even small childrens will bring about any revolution.
Besides, why do you call it a 'surrender'? I was born in 1962 in Assam, which was a part of India. I am a citizen of India by birth. Where is the point of surrendering? A true engineer should believe in 'deriving' not in 'assuming' facts. :)
Regards
Mridul
>From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Roy, Santanu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "mridul bhuyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Assam] Oil India Strikes it rich in Dibrugarh Dist.
>Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:32:06 -0500
>
>
>Something however tells me that Santanu and Mridul had polar
>opposite outlook to things. Santanu's holds on to hope for change,
>while Mridul's surrenders to Indian 'constitutional sanctity', thus
>acquiesces to the unfairness to Assam.
>
>Am I right :-)?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 10:49 AM -0500 6/8/05, Roy, Santanu wrote:
>>Mridul:
>>I actually fully agree with you. I am glad you said that: "Besides,
>>if we can get that we can get independance too."
>>You see, this is a point I have been trying to impress for a long
>>time - that forget about independence or autonomy, even getting the
>>GOI to genuinely transfer a minimal set of economic assets and
>>powers to the state through a constitutional amendment will be
>>resisted with as great ferocity by the corridors of power in Delhi
>>as they would resist a demand for secession.
>>As for day dreaming, there are benefits that emanate from dreams -
>>for example, all of the ideas behind human progress.
>>Santanu.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: mridul bhuyan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:41 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Roy, Santanu; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Cc: [email protected]
>>Subject: RE: [Assam] Oil India Strikes it rich in Dibrugarh Dist.
>>
>>IMHO, all rights of ownership over all natural resources including
>>>>oil should be returned to the people of Assam - OIL and all
>>>>other
>>>>companies can then buy it back from us at market price-
>>>>competitively with foreign bidders - and then float as much
>>>>share
>>>>as they wish everywhere.
>>>>
>>
>>It is easier said than done within the framework of the existing
>>constitution. Besides, if we can get that we can get independance
>>too. Instead of day dreaming, we should explore ways to derive the
>>best.
>>
>>Mridul Bhuyan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: "Roy, Santanu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Dilip/Dil
>>>Deka"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ram Sarangapani"
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>CC: Assam <[email protected]>
>>>Subject: RE: [Assam] Oil India Strikes it rich in Dibrugarh Dist.
>>>Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:00:30 -0500
>>>
>>>You said it like it ought to be Santanu.
>>>
>>>Somehow an ordinary sense of reasoning has been missing from these
>>>convoluted arguments from some of Assam's best.
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>At 9:52 PM -0500 6/7/05, Roy, Santanu wrote:
>>>>Does it strike anybody as being odd that we are suggesting that
>>>>the
>>>>taxpayers of Assam essentially buy ownership of a natural
>>>>resource
>>>>of Assam ?
>>>>
>>>>After all, oil is no different from land or water. Suppose the
>>>>GOI
>>>>floated a company that established ownership over all groundwater
>>>>or forest land in Assam, would we then suggest buying ownership
>>>>shares of that company using the Assamese taxpayers money?
>>>>
>>>>IMHO, all rights of ownership over all natural resources
>>>>including
>>>>oil should be returned to the people of Assam - OIL and all
>>>>other
>>>>companies can then buy it back from us at market price-
>>>>competitively with foreign bidders - and then float as much
>>>>share
>>>>as they wish everywhere.
>>>>
>>>>Santanu.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dilip/Dil
>>>>Deka
>>>>Sent: Wed 6/8/2005 10:59 AM
>>>>To: Ram Sarangapani
>>>>Cc: Assam
>>>>Subject: Re: [Assam] Oil India Strikes it rich in Dibrugarh Dist.
>>>>
>>>>Also, I think its good thing that the company is issuing IPOs.
>>>>Whats
>>>>stopping the GOA (as Barua suggested) or others in Assam from
>>>>buying
>>>>into the company. One needs money to buy shares. Does GOA
>>>>have
>>>>money to spare?
>>>>
>>>>If the GOA is not getting what it ought to be getting from OIL,
>>>>it
>>>>either does not negotiate well, or is not listening to the
>>>>electorate,
>>>>or the electorate is blissfully not aware that they could demand
>>>>the
>>>>GOA work for them. You are correct.
>> >>
>>>>I would not blame OIL, its just looking after its own interests,
>>>>just
>>>>like any other pvt. company. Its for the people to hold the GOAs
>>>>feet
>>>>to the fire. I agree.
>>>>
>>>>Dilip Deka
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>C'da,
>>>>
>>>>>*** I don't believe any of these statistics. There is no history
>>>>>of
>>>>reliable numbers >coming out either in govt. handouts, or in
>>>>private
>>>>company notifications, or news->paper reporters' dispatchers or
>>>>Assam
>>>>netters' speculations.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe you will atleast believe what OIL itself is reporting to
>>>>the
>>>>media. The figures quoted were from OIL (NOT GOI or media
>>>>speculation).
>>>>
>>>>Here is some more financial data from OIL
>>>>http://oilindia.nic.in/perf_financial.htm
>>>>
>>>>Also, I think its good thing that the company is issuing IPOs.
>>>>Whats
>>>>stopping the GOA (as Barua suggested) or others in Assam from
>>>>buying
>>>>into the company.
>>>>
>>>>>There is something grossly unfair about it as far as the owners
>>>>>of
>>>>these natural >resources, the people of Assam, that OIL or ONGC
>>>>get,
>>>>almost for free.
>>>>
>>>>That kind of statement can be made by any state or country - its
>>>>just
>>>>over the top. Should the people of Texas feel cheated because
>>>>Shell
>>>>or
>>>>Exxon operate here at high profits?
>>>>
>>>>The residuals from a company like OIL is that they provide great
>>>>employment opportunities in Assam. They bring technology, explore
>>>>new
>>>>reserves etc.
>>>>
>>>>>That is why a more reliable system of selecting able and
>>>>>accountable
>>>>Assam >govt. is one of the most pressing needs for the people of
>>>>Assam, something the >current Indian model has failed to deliver
>>>>on,
>>>>and cannot in the future, without >fundamental reforms.
>>>>
>>>>Isn't OIl a private entity? And it is governed by all the rules &
>>>>regs
>>>>of such industries. If the GOA wanted a bigger share, they should
>>>>renegotiate with OIL on the contract.
>>>>
>>>>If the GOA is not getting what it ought to be getting from OIL,
>>>>it
>>>>either does not negotiate well, or is not listening to the
>>>>electorate,
>>>>or the electorate is blissfully not aware that they could demand
>>>>the
>>>>GOA work for them.
>>>>
>>>>I would not blame OIL, its just looking after its own interests,
>>>>just
>>>>like any other pvt. company. Its for the people to hold the GOAs
>>>>feet
>>>>to the fire.
>>>>
>>>>I think, the intellectuals in Assam would best serve the state by
>>>>seriously analyzing issues such as royalties from OIL (or ONGC)
>>>>etc,
>>>>and the GOA should listen and implement on their recommendations.
>>>>
>>>>--Ram
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 6/7/05, Chan Mahanta wrote:
>>>>> At 9:51 AM -0500 6/7/05, Rajen Barua wrote:
>>>>> Take it easy. You don't need to interprtet that way. If you
>>>>>don't believe
>>>>> the Rs 1061 crores figure, why don't you come up witth your
>>>>>economics and
>>>>> enlighten the kharhwas? If f you believe, then you should
>>>>>agree
>>>>>with me.
>>>>> Which one it is? Please don't talk on air.
>>>>> Rajen
>>>>>
>>>>> *** I don't believe any of these statistics. There is no
>>>>>history
>>>>>of reliable
>>>>> numbers coming out either in govt. handouts, or in private
>>>>>company
>>>>> notifications, or news-paper reporters' dispatchers or Assam
>>>>>netters'
>>>>> speculations.
>>>>>
>>>>> But one has to believe in something, to be able to deliberate
>>>>>on
>>>>>issues,
>>>>> right?
>>>>> I would agree, but it has to be something that is beyond
>>>>>reproach.
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case, that has to be the fact that OIL is pumping oil.
>>>>>That it is in
>>>>> business making a profit ( a private company cannot stay in
>>>>>business if it
>>>>> is not making a profit, unless it is a desi one,
>>>>>surreptitiously
>>>>>subsidized
>>>>> by the citizenry), that it has discovered new sources of oil
>>>>>and
>>>>>that it
>>>>> pays Assam little, while it makes its profit selling its
>>>>>processed goods at
>>>>> international rates.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is something grossly unfair about it as far as the
>>>>>owners
>>>>>of these
>>>>> natural resources, the people of Assam, that OIL or ONGC get,
>>>>>almost for
>>>>> free.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is one of the many grievances many people of Assam have
>>>>>been fighting
>>>>> against the Center for decades now, without any satisfaction.
>> >>>
>>>>> Now, just because the establishment of Assam does not make
>>>>>waves
>>>>>about it ,
>>>>> does not mean ALL people of Assam acquiesce to it. The proof
>>>>>is
>>>>>the
>>>>> insurgency, which arose due to the short shrift given to the
>>>>>people of
>>>>> Assam by its colonial master, the Center, after its own reps.
>>>>>let it down.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is why a more reliable system of selecting able and
>>>>>accountable Assam
>>>>> govt. is one of the most pressing needs for the people of
>>>>>Assam,
>>>>>something
>>>>> the current Indian model has failed to deliver on, and cannot
>>>>>in
>>>>>the future,
>>>>> without fundamental reforms.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Chan Mahanta
>>>>> To: Rajen Barua ; Ram Sarangapani ; Assam
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 9:25 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Assam] Oil India Strikes it rich in Dibrugarh
>>>>>Dist.
>>>>>
>>>>> > This also shows that owning OIL by Assam may not be that fun
>>>>>after all,
>>>>> and should be a lesson >to the freedom fighters of Assam.
>>>>>There
>>>>>may not be
>>>>> much gold in the golden pot.
>>>>>
>>>>> *** That is serious. Maybe OIL is there for charity to Assam,
>>>>>employing all
>>>>> those lazy people at exorbitant salaries. The Assamese ought
>>>>>to
>>>>>be warned
>>>>> not to rock the boat, asking for more royalty et. OIL may
>>>>>leave
>>>>>and Assam
>>>>> will be left holding the empty wells, and paying them
>>>>>outsiders
>>>>>to close the
>>>>> wells down.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, those freedom fighters need to screw their heads on
>>>>>right.
>>>>>
>>>>> :-) :-) :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> But seriously something seems to be missing in the reasoning
>>>>>here, isn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> At 8:37 AM -0500 6/7/05, Rajen Barua wrote:
>>>>> >their profit has zoomed up to Rs 1061 crores in the last
>>>>> > financial year.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is where we need to know the reality of the economics of
>>>>>situation.
>>>>> Frankly speaking this Rs. 1061 crores profit will be only
>>>>>around
>>>>>5% of total
>>>>> annual oil production revenue of OIL (according to my one
>>>>>estimate and based
>>>>> on present world oil price). This also means that OIL will be
>>>>>incurring a
>>>> > loss if it were to pay the royalty to Assam. This also shows
>>>>that owning OIL
>>>>> by Assam may not be that fun after all, and should be a lesson
>>>>>to the
>>>>> freedom fighters of Assam. There may not be much gold in the
>>>>>golden pot.
>>>>> But there again one need to know how OIL is calculating their
>>>>>profit which
>>>>> may be tricky. Anyhow, I think Assam will be better off just
>>>>>playing dumb
>>>>> and claiming 12.5% royalty which will be around Rs 4000 crores
>>>>>according to
>>>>> one estimate I made earlier. At least that will start the
>>>>>debate
>>>>>and
>>>> > discussion for decentralization. The point is to do
>>>>something.
>>>>At present
>>>>> Assam is just sitting Hobo Diok..
>>>>>
>>>>> RajenBarua
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Ram Sarangapani"
>>>>> To: "Assam"
>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:17 PM
>>>>> Subject: [Assam] Oil India Strikes it rich in Dibrugarh Dist.
>>>>>
>>>>> > This is good news indeed, and the fact that OIL is going for
>>>>>its first
>>>>> IPO.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -----------------
>>>>> >
>>>>> > OIL strikes it rich in three structures in Assam
>>>>> > Guwahati, Jun 06 (UNI) Oil India Limited (OIL) has struck
>>>>>crude
>>>>> > petroleum in the three new structures in Dibrugarh district
>>>>>of
>>>>>Upper
>>>>> > Assam even as their profit has zoomed up to Rs 1061 crores
>>>>>in
>>>>>the last
>>>>> > financial year.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > According to the director's report, the OIL has struck oil
>>>>>in
>>>>>the
>>>>> > three new structures on North Tini Ali, West Zaloni and
>>>>>Samdang-3.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The company is upbeat with the new discoveries as they are
>>>>>preparing
>>>>> > for the first Initial Public Offering (IPO).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The OIL India sources, however, confirmed that they were
>>>>>keeping their
>>>>> > finger crossed about the result of the latest round of the
>>>>>New
>>>>> > Exploratory Licensing Policy (NELP) bidding for getting
>>>>>license for
>>>>> > exploration of the new block.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The ONGC, Reliance and Videocon are pupshing ahead for
>>>>>license
>> >>>in new
>>>>> > prospective blocks of Upper Assam.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The source informed that new discoveries would go a long way
>>>>>to double
>>>>> > the gas and crude production in the next five years through
>>>>>initiative
>>>>> > like breakthrough performance under taken by the company for
>>>>> > organisational transformation.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > In fact the director's report said the profit after tax was
>>>>>Rs
>>>>>1061
>>>>> > crores as the oil and gas products had registered a seven
>>>>>per
>>>>>cent
>>>>> > growth in the last financial year ending March 2005.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Increased production of crude oil and natural gas coupled
>>>>>with
>>>>>increse
>>>>> > in price resulted in company recording the highest ever
>>>>>total
>>>>>income
>>>>> > of Rs 4097 crores.
>>>>> > --From Deepikaglobal.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > Assam mailing list
>>>>> > [email protected]
>>>>> > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Mailing list FAQ:
>>>>> > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
>>>>> > To unsubscribe or change options:
>>>>> > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Assam mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
>>>>>
>>>>> Mailing list FAQ:
>>>>> http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
>>>>> To unsubscribe or change options:
>>>>> http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Assam mailing list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
>>>>
>>>>Mailing list FAQ:
>>>>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
>>>>To unsubscribe or change options:
>>>>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Assam mailing list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
>>>>
>>>>Mailing list FAQ:
>>>>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
>>>>To unsubscribe or change options:
>>>>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Assam mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
>>>
>>>Mailing list FAQ:
>>>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
>>>To unsubscribe or change options:
>>>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
>>
>>
>>
>><http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2755??PS=47575>Get the NEW version of
>>MSN Messenger with Video Conversation - it's FREE!
>_______________________________________________
>Assam mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
>
>Mailing list FAQ:
>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
>To unsubscribe or change options:
>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
Adore Arshad Warsi? Think he is the funniest? Vote [EMAIL PROTECTED] IIFA Awards!
_______________________________________________ Assam mailing list [email protected] http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
Mailing list FAQ: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html To unsubscribe or change options: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
