We used to call them "undocumented features." 😊
Bill Hitefield > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> > On Behalf Of Steve Thompson > Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2024 1:45 PM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: ASMA043E Previously defined symbol > > One place I worked long ago used BAD: Broken as Designed. > > Steve Thompson > > On 5/1/2024 1:25 PM, Steve Smith wrote: > > Ease of bizarre inscrutable errors is not the same as ease of use. > > Just sayin' ;-) > > > > WAD just means it was a bad design. > > > > sas > > > > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 7:00 PM Phil Smith III > > <li...@akphs.com<mailto:li...@akphs.com>> wrote: > > > >> Paul Gilmartin wrote, re Rexx being fine with duplicate labels: > >>> That's bad. > >> That's WAD. Remember, the goal of Rexx was ease of use. Just sayin'. > >>
