While WAD often means BAD, that is not always the case.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> on behalf of Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2024 1:25 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: ASMA043E Previously defined symbol Ease of bizarre inscrutable errors is not the same as ease of use. Just sayin' ;-) WAD just means it was a bad design. sas On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 7:00 PM Phil Smith III <li...@akphs.com> wrote: > Paul Gilmartin wrote, re Rexx being fine with duplicate labels: > >That's bad. > > That's WAD. Remember, the goal of Rexx was ease of use. Just sayin'. >
