2006/5/2, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[atom entry w/ no text]
Tim, I feel I should warn you. Experience teaches that feeds that
contain textual content are in general more useful than those that do
not. Some applications (one example is full-text indexers) require a
minimum amount of text or (X)HTML to function reliably and
predictably.
Hmm, that's not the point of PaceMediaEntriesN.
The current draft doesn't help, neither does your "basic" proposal.
That was my point back in September when we switched to using Atom
Feed Documents for collection membership listings, it has not been
addressed since then (except for the "Title" request header field),
and the current Paces don't aim at addressing it either.
--
Thomas Broyer
