Graham wrote:
No one agrees with you Robert. Quit it.
I suppose then I should state I'm very close to +1 on Robert's position.
I think this is an important discussion, insofar as whether the link or the content is primary stuff, and I wouldn't to see it cut short because it became another syndication row.
I'm trying to figure out what the problem with optional content is and I can't see it. if I have a link/id for something and a bag of metadata related to that link I don't have to have a content blob for that to be useful or interoperable.
In particular the accessibility argument hasn't work for me (I have formal design/human-factors training and practice under my belt, but I'm not claiming to be an accessibility expert viz the Web).
cheers Bill
