On 5/9/05, Roger B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have no problem with title only feeds.
>
> I'm -1 on POS, although I wouldn't describe myself as being positioned
> in the path of oncoming traffic.
>
> Title-only feeds have valid uses, but they're really out of scope for
> a feed format that only exists because it provides a clearer, cleaner
> way to deliver content.
Roger, please don't see this as an attack.
Here's our charter:
----------------------------------
The format must be able to represent:
...
* a feed or channel of entries, with or without enclosed
content
...
----------------------------------
I don't think there's a scope argument here.
Robert Sayre
