Tim Bray wrote:
> I think the WG basically decided to punt on the DOS scenario. -Tim
I believe you are correct in describing the WG's unfortunate
disposition towards this issue. (Naturally, I object...) In any case, given
that a significant DOS attack has been identified -- yet not addressed -- I
think it would be both wise and appropriate to provide text in a Security
Concerns section that describes the vulnerability of systems that rely on
Atom documents to this particular attack.
bob wyman
