On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:24 +0100, Bill de hÓra wrote: > Sam Ruby wrote: > > > Even if we decide that whitespace is not significant, I do believe that > > having the feedvalidator issue a warning in such cases is appropriate. > > +1
What is the IETF version of an errata sheet? Is that the right place to tackle this? I'm with Bill, I'm sure we'll see many instances which have whitespace included, with a simplistic assumption that the element contains an IRI, and nothing more. James makes a good point about whitespace stripping in the other elements. Looking at http://relaxng.org/spec-20011203.html The anyURI symbol has the same meaning as the anyURI datatype of [W3C XML Schema Datatypes]: it indicates a string that, after escaping of disallowed values as described in Section 5.4 of [XLink], is a URI reference as defined in [RFC 2396] (as modified by [RFC 2732]). I can't see how the anyURI fits with element content; all the examples I've seen use it as an attribute value which I think is clearer due to XML 1.0 regards DaveP
