Re: Blatant Character Assassination Hasn't Been Dealt With Yet
Moderation:
I was hoping not to have to spend the next little while justifying admin actions, but.. You know how it is.
1. The reason why no warnings were issued as of yet is that the topic was deleted by the original poster. yes he did choose to erase it only after several people suggested it but he did do so. People can sit here and speculate if he did it because he was sorry for his actions, or if he thought it would save him from any punishment. I have my ownviews, but again. Being an admin means being imparcial.
2. The victim of the slander did not want any warnings or bans given. he believes that people will play his demo, and will judge it for themselves. But this leads me to.
3. As the OP believes so steadfast in the rules, I'm sure he knows that in order for a warning to be levied character assassination, two staff members need to be present to do so. that means as a staff member, I can not warn someone on my own for doing that. This is designed to protect users from personal biases.
End Moderation:
Now a personal note. if someone truly believes in a set of rules, there are avenues in which can ask quesiton and express displeasure on how something was handled. instead, using a new topic to bring up an issue with how something was handled just smacks of a disrespect for the process in general. instead, the first thoughtwhen reading this is. Wow. The OP must really want Redfox to get warned. Am I saying that is the case? Absolutely not, but I am saying that it raises the suspicion meter higher than it needs to be.
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
