Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
@Ethin: that paper was not discredited, either. Not to mention so many references to other publications, many of them leading to PubMed or NCBI articles. Here's what I want to know. Isn't NCBI a reliable source to read research publications? Why would they host pseudoscientific stuff if they're considered reliable? But you and @camlorn totally nailed it. It might very well be pseudoscientific, can't deny the possibility of that. Except, of course, @camlorn: minus the ad hominem. .
@GCW, man, I am too skeptical to fully believe your experiences, but too openminded to fully reject them outright as well. You and @mastodont especially talk about stuff which on the subjective level is experienced by many over the millennia so there's that. Even though there are stark similarities, subjectivity can't be made the basis for objective, nonbiased rationalistic enquiry.
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
