krzys wrote: > Robin Bowes;134013 Wrote: >> krzys wrote: >>> This is the future guys so you have to start looking seriously at >> the >>> DRC. >> Chris, >> >> The discussion is about using outboard devices to do DRC, not just >> DEQ. >> >> R. > > Exactly, I was pointing that. Why bodering to use an outboard device if > you HAVE to use the PC to play music and the PC can do all the EQ and > DRC for no cost , no intermediate box, no cables (ie less jitter)and > with much better potential correction (phase!)?
No, you're misunderstanding. The outboard box would do just the same as the PC. The correction would not be any different. You would still measure the room impulse response in the same way, but apply the correction on the outboard device rather than on the server. I'm not saying it's better or worse - just pointing out that you seem to have misunderstood somewhat. R. _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
