P Floding;179836 Wrote: > 1. You seem to have forgotten the heading for this thread.
I didn't start this conversation. Someone else came into this thread, after it had finally died, and started making false statements about BT. > > 2. You seem to think negative results have significance. So you don't > seem to understand what "not insteresting" means in this context. They obviously do have significance - they provide strong evidence that the subject couldn't hear a difference under the test circumstances. That's very useful information. And by the way, it's meaningless to speak about negative versus positive results: there isn't really any such distinction, either in formal logic or the practice of science. > > 3. Thanks for continiously underlining the need for a DBT-nagging free > zone. You're doing exactly the same. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32352 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
