P Floding wrote: > opaqueice;179870 Wrote: >> I didn't start this conversation. Someone else came into this thread, >> after it had finally died, and started making false statements about >> BT. >> >> >> >> They obviously do have significance - they provide strong evidence that >> the subject couldn't hear a difference under the test circumstances. >> That's very useful information. And by the way, it's meaningless to >> speak about negative versus positive results: there isn't really any >> such distinction, either in formal logic or the practice of science. >> >> >> >> You're doing exactly the same. > > Yes, but I want such a zone... > > Negative results: > > 1. We would like to prove that there exists red cars. > 2. We observe cars. > 3a. We see red car. We have proven that at least one red car exists. > or > 3b. We never see a red car. We didn't prove a single thing. This is > what's called a "negative result".
or 3c. Our observer is colour-blind and only ever sees grey cars. R. _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
