ezkcdude;184290 Wrote: > As someone who certainly believes in, if not actually practices, ABX, I > would love if this test produced a positive result. Who cares which > test you use to show differences? As long as the tests are unbiased, > any positive result (i.e. audible difference) is something worth > shooting for. Not sure you quite got the point I was trying to make. (If you did, and I've misunderstood your reply, then my apologies).
What I was trying to get at is that it seems entirely plausible to me that while an ABX test using the full signal might yield a negative result (meaning that there is no audible difference while listening to actual music), it is quite possible that this difference test will produce a positive result. The flat-earthers will then latch onto that result to support their claims that the difference they think they hear is real, and therefore proves that ABX is flawed. -- cliveb Performers -> dozens of mixers and effects -> clipped/hypercompressed mastering -> you think a few extra ps of jitter matters? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33127 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
