pfarrell;347456 Wrote: > Themis wrote: > > > I was talking about the METHOD which is lossless. Is there > > any theory saying that a non-transforming METHOD is lossy ? Can you > > please enlighten me ? > > Can you enlighten me on what you mean by "METHOD" here? > Do you mean method acting? or something else. > > I'm not following any of this recent section of the thread. > Analogue microphones (1) transform the signal and (2) are lossy. > > They are the first thing in the recording chain. If you want no > transformations and nothing lossy, go to a recital.
That still will not achieve the goal. Human hearing is lossy. Just ask my dog. -- jeffmeh ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jeffmeh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3986 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53355 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
