wayne325;418425 Wrote: > > > > Fourth, for those who have a T3 alrady and are playing 96/24 files, is > there > a significant difference between those and CD ripped files? (I would > think > so). Along hese lines I downloaded the sampler 96/24 files from > HDtracks > and played thru my Duet. I thought it was quite dynamic compared to CD. > Note > that the Duet cannot play 96 kHz, I read that the PC SW downconverts > the > 96 kHz sample rate to 48 kHz, and sends that to the Duet. > > Cheers, and thanks....
Hmmm. I did a lousy job of writing this. What I meant was - if one compares: 1) CD ripped to file and play over transporter to "good" external DAC 2) that same source material that was mastered at 96/24 and played back over Transporter on the same DAC (obviously DAC is 44.1 / 96 capable) (eg (1) CD of Rebecca Pidgeon's "The Raven" ripped vs (2) the same album as 96/24 flac downloaded from HDtunes and both played thru Transporter -> external DAC) Are people finding the 96/24 version significantly better sonically? Doesn't #2 sound a bunch better? -- wayne325 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ wayne325's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=29916 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=62747 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
