iPhone wrote: > zzvelik;496380 Wrote: >> The positive beta reviews coupled with last Friday's delay announcement >> makes me wonder if the Touch is being crippled in some way so it doesn't >> take any market share away from the Transporter. > > Why would the Touch take any market share from the Transporter? The > Touch is an upgraded replacement for the SB3 (Classic). Yes it does > 24/96 native, but it is no Transporter or TP replacement. The Touch is > not being "Crippled" in any way.
While I agree with @iPhone that the Touch is not crippled in any way, I do see a way for the Touch to be a replacement for the Transporter. The Touch is better from an audiophile standpoint than the Classic, way better. So you can argue that the Touch could take 80% or more of the TP market. Since the TP market is tiny, its not much of a stretch to have it take it all. Plus, the TP is old. While its still an impressive piece, I'm not sure that the TP has much more life. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
