Phil Leigh;544008 Wrote: 
> Human AGC is quite slow to act. It won't track the levels in that
> Offenbach example. It's not intended to be a fast-acting compressor -
> we have an evolutionary need to differentiate loud/quiet to stay alive
> (loud=near, quiet=far away to misquote Father Ted...) The rate at which
> level changes tells us something about how fast the source is moving.
> Two ears helps us determine direction of movement...
Agreed. As I said I was referring to turning down the volume, which is
a long-term change.

I've moved my position since the beginning of the thread on this point,
because of what I've read. No doubt.

I'm probably somewhere between your/Clive's position and mswlogo's in
that (a) I think the lower the volume the less requirement for dynamic
range but (b) I think human hearing does adjust to a certain degree
(not perfectly).

I would like to see more evidence or resources on this particular point
before saying any more. As I say, given 16 bit source material on a high
performing DAC this question is effectively moot.
Darren


-- 
darrenyeats

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503.

(Inguz bass EQ'd) SB3 -> (pre bypassed) Krell KAV-300i -> PMC AB-1
(caps bass EQ'd) Desktop -> Genius Slab SW-flat2.1 700
Sennheiser HD 25-1 II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=77725

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to