cliveb;601345 Wrote: > > Add to this the fact that all Beatles recordings were made on 60's > analogue gear that doesn't come even remotely close to the capabilities > of 16/44.1, what are they doing dicking around with "hi-res" at all? > (Other than to extract more cash from the already sucked-dry consumer, > of course)
As long as some "audiophile educated" report it sounds better they sell what the audience wants to buy. I bet we even have a few members around here that will hear the Beatles at 32bit/384kHz just that "tiny foot-tipping" bit beter as the 24bit/192kHz release ;) -- Wombat Transporter -> RG142 -> Avantgarde based monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=72852 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles