firedog;601646 Wrote: > Have you listened to many (or any) recent remasters of "old" recordings? > Good 60's recordings have LOTS of information and detail that is > rendered more audible in a quality digital transcription. I've heard plenty of remasters. Some of them are good, and some of them are dire. I don't deny the fact that a good remastering can reveal details missing on previous versions.
But what has this got to do with redbook v hi-res? Nothing. A good mastering can be delivered in either format. You talk about 60's recordings with lots of information, but I respectfully suggest to you that the total number of these with more information than can be captured in 16/44.1 LPCM (ie. redbook format) is zero. -- cliveb Transporter -> ATC SCM100A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=72852 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
