This will be post #34 of this thread and we are already rehashing old
ground, i.e. that both analog and digital recordings can sound very
good. Regardless of whether HDTracks is selling a 40 year old analog
recording or a brand new full digital recording the fact of the matter
is that their pricing structure does not reflect the current market
conditions.

With so many avenues available for people to obtain lower cost copies
of the same exact files (setting aside the legality of those copies)
one would think that HDTracks would look for a more sustainable
business model. Raising prices for those who choose to obtain the files
legally while there remain those who obtain the files illegally at
little or no cost is just not very fair.

Perhaps a better question would be just how much more do the surviving
members of the Rolling Stones receive for each high resolution download
and are they paid more for each 24/176 download then they are for each
24/88 download. Otherwise why the big price difference between the two
resolutions.

My gut feeling tells me that the tired old argument regarding ripping
off the artist applies more to HDTracks and other download sites than
it does to anyone illegally downloading the files. In other words,
since in all likelihood the artist's original contract had no mention
of revenue obtained from high resolution downloads, after all how could
it if the contract was written in the 1960s, then the record companies
and download sites, NOT the artists, are the ones reaping the lion's
share of the profits from these high prices.

Please if anyone has knowledge of facts that disprove the above
statement, by all means, speak up.


-- 
ralphpnj

Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels -> Snatch -> The Transporter ->
Transporter 2 (oops) -> Touch

'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=86017

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to