EricBergan wrote: > I do subscribe. I do seem to remember one letter asking some questions > (and not in the right area) and the authors basically said they got it > right, and it's left to the doubters to explain why they heard a > difference. > > What I'm really seeing is that neither TAS nor Stereophile really have a > truly digital-savvy editor, so no one challenges what the authors, or > letter writers, submit. I mean, let's face it, publishing a letter that > basically says that in a rigorous test, sonic character got added > converting from flac to wav is pretty embarrassing. As one friend put > it, "I'm sure they also believe if they print out a photo and scan it at > higher resolution, it will get better."
I also subscribe since for $12 a year I get the BEST humor magazine currently being published (with Stereophile a very close second). Any of the letters to the editor criticizing the 2012 Computer Audio series were basically dismissed with some asinine comment from the clown in chief. As for TAS and Stereophile not having digital savvy editors and writers there is really no way to tell since these magazines will NEVER publish any information which might reveal that the high end cable manufacturer's products are worthless and remember that high end cable manufacturers are these magazines biggest advertisers. Once you do away with the truth then everything just becomes a free for all where anything goes, hence the 2012 Computer Audio series. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98630 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
