arnyk wrote: > jkeny I don't think you have what it takes to provide such a thing (and > this opinion has been shared on another forum where you are well known), > so I have *-no-* thoughts about it ever happening. > > The usual procedure is to evaluate evidence as it appears. You've > already demonstrated in recent posts that you don't see the need for > this approach, so there is no need to discuss this further. > > Here is a relevant piece of friendly advice: > > A rule of thumb is that a single listening test by a single person is a > single data point and that it takes confirmation by means of additional > listening tests performed by other people to create a critical mass of > strong evidence.
As you well know I have produced positive ABX results on AVS forum for differentiating high-res files & you rejected both mine & Amir's numerous positive results saying that you distrusted us & that only if the test was run with a trusted administrator would you accept any results from me or him. So you have rejected multiple positive results by different people on the basis that you don;t trust them You are jut playing your usual games, Arny which are transparent to all - each bit of evidence that you don't like is rejected & further requirements or tests called for. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
