jkeny wrote: > If the test is inherently skewed towards producing null results unless > very carefully administered by professionals with expertise in the area > of perceptual testing, then repeating it ad-nauseum will not make any > difference - you will consistently get null results
So how is even a reasonable attempt to create a double-blind test "inherently skewed towards producing null results" whereas the many claims of sighted tests which likely have significantly less rigor in terms of creating a "fair" test but are not conversely much more skewed towards producing a "non-null test result"? The point is, if these changes make such a profound difference in performance, then it would be very difficult to create a double-blind test which is "inherently skewed towards producing null results". ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tcutting's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17402 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
