arnyk wrote: > It would appear to be the prerequisite radical subjectivist personal > attack... > > ...Jkeny lives in a logic-tight box... > > Next!
Gentlemen, I have been using this forum for a good few years now. There are, as you will have noticed, a mix of subjectivists, objectivists, and in-between. Its mostly frequented by people with squeezeboxy devices, but also others. There is a lot of knowledge and experience, and people are usually helpful with answering questions and are generally accepting of other peoples points of view. However since 25 May when you both locked horns, the SNR has gone South. Id just like to play back snippets from just some some of your (c. 250 each) posts. _JKENY_ As if anybody is in any doubt about your intentions to incite flame wars - all they have to do is look at this post & your many posts here. This is a conversation between Archi & me - how about you butt out with your usual comments which are simply meant to incite flame wars. Jeez, man, did you fail reading comprehension in school or are you just pretending to be so stupid? Again, you can't but demonstrate your stupidity, Arny, can you? I believe ArnyK is in his 70s - go figure!! Your foolishness is now a tsunami that is in danger of washing all sensible posts away, Arny Not the fantasy discussion you & Arny are having about 8KHz USB protocol noise Yep, it's the usual logic from this contingent "Yes, Arny, you & Archi can continue with your fantasy discussion" I think you might be confused between real & bonkers" Don't be such an idiot Give it up, Wombat!! Sure, it's simple, Mnyb :) This is the type of statement that reveals just how far you guys are from actually understanding measurements - it's very representative of Archi's fan base No, huh - no suggestions! Can't say that surprises me. I've already explained it many times - you simply don't understand. And another "objectivsit/measureist" asking how this might be measured - hilarious!! Absolute bullshit that I already corrected you & Arny before And if you want advice about trolling go to an expert like Arny I somehow thought you were in your 70s from your posts on AVS Yea, there you go, again - an attempt to demean & show delusional superiority! Arny, I thought you might have left after making this post - (you should, btw). So let's see if you still assert this stupidity that you posted Bluff & bluster won't disguise your mistakes. Go off now & regroup you measurbators, take a little pleasure in a twiddle with your equipment. I don't need to give links - any sane person knows the issue Again, your desire to be always right shows up your foolishness You prove yourself again to be such a fool, Arny Good to see at least one of you is open to new information/data No, you also seem to have great difficulty in understanding the technology & what it's addressing This is getting more like a Christmas pantomime. Arny, I'm outside with my handbag, where are you? Wow & this coming from a guy who created a so-called listening test of high resolution audio Yes you share the same inability to understand the device as ralphpnj - who is also a poster on the thread for the afflicted & disaffected ""Reformed Audiophile True Confessions" - so you share a lot... Arny, you bring nothing to this thread but noise! I'm pretty sure you are feigning not understanding this as another one of your forum debate tactics but Yep, it's the usual logic from this contingent - business is involved so therefore it's a snakeoil business trying to extricate money _ARNYK_ If you might learn anything from the recent (mis) behavior of people like jkeny or cliveb, I don't have to bother with seeking out and attacking people Wow! You do play dumb very well Jkeny. Oh, its not an act? It is a paraphrase not a quote. For future reference, if I post a quote, there are quotation marks. Don't they teach about quotation marks in Ireland? I guess that the Irish public schools didn't teach you much about reading and critical thinking, because if they did Jkeny As usual jkeny is trying to put his dumb words in my mouth If that is him, then his area of greatest interest and expertise seems to be food trucks in the Pittsburgh area Interesting - jkeny admits it right here in public. All it takes to start a flame war with jkeny is to ask him for some reliable evidence. No jkeny, no reading problems here. I just know what the numbers mean. You obviously don't. A true sign that I drew serious blood by bringing up the touchy subject of actual test results, which is an obvious failing of jkeny's ongoing trolling. Yes, but based on past experience with you John, you are incapable of appreciating or benefiting from the explanation. Any reasonable explanation will be bent, folded, spindled, torn and mutilated. No need to be insulting. Can't we talk? False. False. I've explained the reasons why these claims are false to you in the past on another forum John, and you were unable to comprehend the somewhat lengthy explanation. Noise without relevant content seems to describe most of your posts. Why don't you take your own advice? Just because name or names aren't mentioned doesn't keep a libelous post from being a personal attack. ????????????????? I have to admit that the above looks like good evidence of a lack of reading comprehension. It would appear that ridicule is all you've got. If you actually had something useful to say, you'd have said it by now. I have no idea. Given that you seem to be a anti-science golden ear, it is possible that your audio system is technically speaking, sheerest junk. I don't know why you'd mention that jkeny, because what is there from you is a lot of empty talk that was summarized as follows: By now it should be quite clear that you failed. I wonder how long it will take you to recognize that. Obviously jkeny, you have no clue about the technical means by which noise measurements are performed and why. (1) Audiophile Sighted Casual Evaluations are not admissible because they are not tests. That is, they... (1) Audiophile Sighted Casual Evaluations... (1) Audiophile Sighted Casual Evaluations... (2) Their personal Casual, Sighted Audiophile... That's just a baseless allegation as stated. You discredit yourself when you spew such poorly formed thoughts. Any ADULT who understood our situation would say that at worst we disagree. Noting... So jkeny, in your universe, the Laws Of Physics are settled by means of a popularity contest? Everybody votes that water flows uphill, and it starts doing so? Interestingly enough, this kind of thinking is nowhere to be found when the order of the day is jkeny trying to hawk his questionable USB DACs on the web. Believe based on a star in the sky, or believe based on inside information? Executive summary - more deflections and pseudo-technical hand waving Corrected? Based on what, some egregiously flawed pseudo technical speculations and horribly flawed listening evaluations? Pure deflection. I debunked it so now you want to distance yourself from it. Typical of self-defeating audiophile prejudices. There is no lie, and the above is a vile but apparently very satisfying (to you) personal attack I'm trying to buy, borrow, or steal a clue as to why JH901 has any credentials that put him as far above the rest of us as he seems to believe that he is Given the outcome of those threads that you started after the long hiatus Jkeny, I can see why you would now wish to cover your tracks! Just another baseless false claim from Jkeney Just more evidence that if you ask Jkeny his name and you are really lucky, he might even tell you what it is. Do you know what reliable and scientific means? Do you know why "Blind test" is a phrase that golden ears commonly use as a deflection? Yes, the serious failings of the grotesquely flawed... So Jkeny when are you going to admit to the foul sad truth about casual audiophile listening evaluations - you know the fact that they are so bad that they can't even be properly called tests Because of our correspondent's lengthy track record for utter denial and hypocrisy when it comes to his preferred but violently anti-scientific (on many grounds) format for listening evaluations When your opponent has nothing left to add to the argument but name-calling, you have won the argument on points in the eyes of everybody who is thinking rationally. Move on! Oh jkeny, so your next error of the day is to assert that jitter and long term clock timing errors have nothing to do with the frequency of the audio signals being transmitted? <snip additional deflections> Again, game, set, match. Deflect, deflect, deflect. So, jkeny who that actually understands DACs OEMs yours for you? There is this jkeny guy who says: Buy my DACs because they sound better - "more organic." Organic reminds me of a smelly compost pile, but what ever. Wow, jkeny has empowered himself to speak for the 100's if not 1000's of people who post on this forum! Amazing! Commodity hubs habitually blowing USB gear is a false claim. But jkeny, I'll bet you can bully naive audiophiles with trash talk like that. There is no perhaps here. The remark has been forcibly and violently misconstrued. The only question in my mind is whether it was misconstrued as an honest error, or maliciously The questions that I would like to ask each of you are: 1. Do you think that those posts add value to the forum? 2. Are you proud of your posts? Cheers, Rick ------------------------------------------------------------------------ artee's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32816 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103950
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
